|00:00:00||ENSURE THAT EARMARKS ARE IN THE PAST.|
|00:00:05||SPEAKER, THIS LEGISLATION IS STILL -- FILLED WITH EARMARKS.|
|00:00:08||NOT THE LEAST OF WHICH IS THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE.|
|00:00:12||NOT THE LEAST OF WHICH IS THE BISMARCK PROVISION.|
|00:00:16||MR. SPEAKER, THE AMOUNT OF EARMARKS VIOLATING BOTH REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC HOUSE RULES AGAINST EARMARKS IS BEYOND THE COUNTING OF ANY OF US.|
|00:00:27||SO, MY POINT OF ORDER IS INTENDED TO STOP THE BILL UNTIL EARMARKS CAN BE REMOVED FROM THE BILL.|
|00:00:34||I MIGHT NOTE, MR.|
|00:00:37||SPEAKER, LAST NIGHT, UNTIL LATE AT NIGHT, FOR MORE THAN 13 HOURS, REPUBLICANS OFFERED 80 AMENDMENTS, MANY OF WHICH COULD HAVE FIXED PORTIONS OF THIS BILL, NONE, I REPEAT, MR.|
|00:00:48||SPEAKER, NONE WERE RULED IN ORDER.|
|00:00:51||SPEAKER, I MAKE A POINT OF ORDER THAT AN EARMARK IS TANTAMOUNT TO A BRIBE.|
|00:00:56||AN EARMARK TO RECEIVE A VOTE IS CLEARLY A WAY TO GET A VOTE IN RETURN FOR SOMETHING OF VALUE.|
|00:01:06||MR. SPEAKER, THE HOUSE IS NOT IN ORDER.|
|00:01:08||THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE: THE GENTLEMAN DESERVES TO BE HEARD.|
|00:01:14||THE HOUSE WILL BE IN ORDER.|
|00:01:18||MR. ISSA: MR.|
|00:01:19||SPEAKER -- THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE: THE GENTLEMAN WILL CONTINUE TO SUSPEND.|
|00:01:26||THE HOUSE WILL BE IN ORDER.|
Mr. ISSA. Mr. Speaker, my point of order is quite simple. In the last 2 weeks, both the House Republicans and the House Democrats have passed sweeping anti-earmark resolutions. Moreover, the leadership of the House has said that they will ensure that earmarks are in the past. But, Mr. Speaker, this legislation is filled with earmarks, not the least of which is the Louisiana purchase, not the least of which is the Bismark provision. Mr. Speaker, the amount of earmarks violating both Republican and Democratic House rules against earmarks is beyond the counting of any of us. My [Page: H1829] point of order is intended to stop the bill until earmarks can be removed from the bill.
I might note, Mr. Speaker, last night until late at night, for more than 13 hours, Republicans offered 80 amendments, many of which could have fixed portions of this bill. None--I repeat, Mr. Speaker, none--were ruled in order.
Mr. Speaker, I make a point of order that an earmark is tantamount to a bribe. An earmark to receive a vote is clearly a way to get a vote in return for something of value.
Mr. Speaker, this legislation is a vast tax increase and a vast increase in the reach of government. It deserves to be considered on its merits, not based on promises and bribes for financial gain to various Members' districts. Therefore, it is clear we must remove all earmarks before this legislation can move forward.
I reserve the balance of my time.