|00:00:00||LEGISLATION IN THE COMING WEEKS.|
|00:00:02||I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH MY COLLEAGUES IN BOTH CHAMBERS AND ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE AS WE MOVE FORWARD.|
|00:00:08||WITH THIS LEGISLATION, WE ARE UNDERTAKING A SERIOUS CAUSE: REPEAL OF THE TRAVEL BAN IS LONG OVERDUE.|
|00:00:17||THERE ARE NUMEROUS REASONS TO INTRODUCE THIS LEGISLATION, BUT I WANT TO FOCUS TODAY ON JUST TWO.|
|00:00:23||FIRST, THE CURRENT SITUATION IN CUBA AND, SECOND, OUR TROUBLED ECONOMY HERE AT HOME.|
|00:00:30||INTRODUCTION OF THIS LEGISLATION COMES AT A CRUCIAL TIME IN U.|
|00:00:36||LAST MONTH NEARLY 80 CUBAN DISSIDENTS WERE ARRESTED.|
|00:00:42||ALL OF THEM HAVE BEEN SENTENCED TO AN AVERAGE OF ALMOST 20 YEARS IN PRISON.|
|00:00:46||DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE WORLD AS WELL AS HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHERS OTHERS, INCLUDING MYSELF AND MY COLLEAGUES IN THE SENATE AND HOUSE HAVE HARSHLY CRITICIZED THE CASTRO REGIME FOR THESE APPALLING ACTS OF REPRESSION.|
|00:01:03||YET, THROUGHOUT ALL OF THIS, THE CASTRO REGIME HAS REMAINED DEFIANT AND UNDAUNTED.|
|00:01:11||WHY? IN MY VIEW IT'S BECAUSE CASTRO WANTS THE EMBARGO TO CONTINUE.|
|00:01:16||OBSERVERS HAVE NOTED AND EMERGING PATTERN.|
|00:01:19||EVERY TIME WE GET CLOSE TO MORE OPEN RELATIONS, CASTRO SHUTS DOWN THE PROCESS WITH SOME REPRESSIVE ACT DESIGNED TO HAVE A CHILLING EFFECT ON U.|
|00:01:31||S.-CUBAN RELATIONS. CASTRO FEARS AN END TO THE EMBARGO.|
|00:01:36||BELIEVE ME, I HAVE A SENSE -- I'VE BEEN THERE.|
|00:01:39||I'VE SPOKEN TO CASTRO, BEEN TO CUBA.|
|00:01:42||YOU CAN FEEL IT.|
|00:01:44||HE KNOWS THE DAY THE EMBARGO FALLS IS THE DAY HE RUNS OUT OF EXCUSES.|
|00:01:49||WITHOUT THE EMBARGO, CASTRO WOULD HAVE NO ONE TO BLAME FOR THE FAILING CUBAN ECONOMY.|
|00:01:55||NOR WOULD HIS WAY OF GOVERNING BE ABLE TO SURVIVE THE INFLUX OF AMERICANS AND DEMOCRATIC IDEAS THAT WOULD FLOOD HIS ISLAND IF THE EMBARGO WERE LIFTED.|
|00:02:06||NOW, SOME CUBAN WATCHERS HAVE PREDICTED THAT THE DISSIDENT ARRESTS AND RESULTING DECLINE OF U.|
|00:02:13||S.-CUBAN RELATIONS OR A DEATH NAIL TO THE ENGAGEMENT DEBATE IN WASHINGTON.|
|00:02:18||I STRONGLY DISAGREE.|
|00:02:19||I STRONGLY DISAGREE.|
|00:02:22||AND I THINK NOW MORE THAN EVER A GENUINE, HONEST DEBATE ABOUT THE MERITS OF EMBARGO IS NEEDED.|
|00:02:33||SOME PEOPLE SEEM TO THINK TIGHTENING THE EMBARGO IS A RASH RESPONSE TO THE CASTRO REGIME.|
|00:02:38||I GUESS IF YOU THINK AN EMBARGO CAN HURT CASTRO WITHOUT HURTING THE CUBAN PEOPLE, THEN TIGHTENING THE EMBARGO MIGHT MAKE SOME SENSE.|
|00:02:46||BUT IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY.|
|00:02:49||THE EMBARGO ACTUALLY HURTS THE CUBAN PEOPLE MUCH MORE THAN IT HURTS CASTRO.|
|00:02:55||THAT IS WHY MANY CUBAN DISSIDENTS, INCLUDING ES WALDO PAYO IMPOSE IT.|
|00:03:06||INDEED, AFTER 43 YEARS IT OUGHT TO BE CLEAR TO EVERYONE THAT THE EMBARGO HAS FAILED TO WEAKEN CASTRO.|
|00:03:12||HE'S NO WEAKER TODAY.|
|00:03:13||A BETTER APPROACH IS TO REACH OUT TO THE CUBAN PEOPLE.|
|00:03:18||ENDING THE TRAVEL BAN IS THE FIRST AND BEST WAY TO DO THIS.|
|00:03:21||IF CASTRO FEARS QUON TACT BETWEEN THE CUBAN PEOPLE AND THE -- CONTACT BETWEEN THE CUBAN PEOPLE AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, THE NATURAL RESPONSE IS TO SEND MORE AMERICANS, NOT FEWER.|
|00:03:32||OF COURSE, ENDING THE TRAVEL BAN WOULD HAVE BENEFITS FOR THE ONLY FOR THE CUBAN PEOPLE BUT ALSO FOR AMERICANS.|
|00:03:39||ENDING THE TRAVEL BAN WOULD HAVE AN IMMEDIATE AND DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT BEYOND EVEN THE IMMEDIATE TRAVEL SECTOR.|
|00:03:47||MOST IMPORTANTLY FROM MY HOME STATE OF MONTANA, ENDING THE TRAVEL BAN WOULD HELP FARMERS AND RANCHERS.|
|00:03:55||AMERICANS ARE CURRENTLY ALLOWED TO SELL FOOD AND MEDICINE TO CUBA BUT ON A CASH BASIS ONLY.|
|00:04:01||THERE'S A LOT OF RED TAPE THROWN IN THEIR WAY.|
|00:04:04||WITHOUT THE ABILITY TO TRAVEL TO CUBA AND DEVELOP THE BUSINESS CONTACTS, THE PERSONAL CONTACTS, THE FULL POTENTIAL OF THESE SALES IS NOT REALIZED.|
|00:04:14||IN FACT, ONE STUDY HAS SUGGESTED THAT LIFTING THE TRAVEL BAN COULD RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL QUARTER BILLION DOLLARS OF AGRICULTURE SALES AND CREATE THOUSANDS OF NEW JOBS IN AMERICA.|
|00:04:27||ENDING THE TRAVEL BAN WOULD BRING BENEFITS TO BOTH CUBANS AND TO AMERICANS.|
|00:04:32||AFTER THAT, AFTER ALL IT'S WHAT THIS DEBATE SHOULD BE ALL ABOUT.|
|00:04:36||THAT'S WHAT IT SHOULD BE ABOUT.|
|00:04:38||BETTER RELATIONS AND BENEFITS FOR BOTH COUNTRIES.|
|00:04:42||SUPPORTERS OF THE EMBARGO ARE ALSO FOCUSED ON HURTING CASTRO -- THEY ARE SO FOCUSED ON HURTING CASTRO THAT THEY ACTUALLY STRENGTHEN HIM AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CUBAN PEOPLE AND AT THE EXPENSE OF OUR OWN ECONOMY.|
|00:04:55||I HOPE MY COLLEAGUES WILL JOIN ME IN COSPONSORING THIS IMPORTANT LEGISLATION.|
|00:04:58||I BELIEVE IT IS THE BEST WAY TO SHOW THAT WE TRULY CARE ABOUT THE CUBAN PEOPLE AND INDEED IF WE TRULY CARE ABOUT DEMOCRACY, THEN LET US SEND CUBA ACTUALLY THAT.|
|00:05:10||SEND THEM DEMOCRACY BY LIFTING THE TRAVEL BAN.|
|00:05:12||LET US TRAVEL TO CUBA AND SHOW THEM DEMOCRACY IN ACTION.|
|00:05:17||MADAM PRESIDENT, I YIELD THE FLOOR AND SUGGEST THE ABSENCE OF A QUORUM.|
|00:05:20||THE PRESIDING OFFICER: THE CLERK WILL CALL THE ROLL.|
|00:05:25||QUORUM CALL: n LEN MR.|
|00:41:51||THE PRESIDING OFFICER: THE SENATOR FROM VIRGINIA.|
|00:41:53||MR. ALLEN: MR.|
|00:41:54||PRESIDENT, I MOVE THAT THE QUORUM CALL BE DISPENSED WITH AND WE MOVE TO A VOTE ON S.|
|00:42:00||THE PRESIDING OFFICER: WITHOUT OBJECTION, SO ORDERED.|
|00:42:03||THE CLERK WILL READ THE BILL FOR THE THIRD TIME.|
|00:42:07||THE CLERK: S. 196, A BILL TO ESTABLISH A DIGITAL AND WIRELESS NETWORK TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.|
Mr. BAUCUS. Madam President, I rise today to offer legislation, along with my colleagues Senator ENZI and Senator DORGAN, that would end the restrictions placed on travel to Cuba.
I understand our colleagues in the House will introduce companion legislation in the coming weeks. I look forward to working with my colleagues in both chambers, and on both sides of the aisle, as we move forward.
With this legislation, we are undertaking a serious cause. Repeal of the travel ban is long overdue.
There are numerous reasons to introduce this legislation, but I want to focus today on just two: first, the current situation in Cuba; and second, our troubled economy here at home.
Introduction of this legislation comes at a crucial time in U.S.-Cuba relations. Last month, nearly 80 Cuban dissidents were arrested. All of them have been sentenced to an average of almost 20 years in prison.
Democratic governments around the world, as well as human rights organizations and others, including myself and my colleagues in the Senate and House Cuba Working Groups, have harshly criticized the Castro regime for these appalling acts of repression. Yet, throughout all of this, the Castro regime has remained defiant and undaunted.
Why? In my view it is because Castro wants the embargo to continue. Observers have noted an emerging pattern: every time we get close to more open relations, Castro shuts the process down with some repressive act, designed to have a chilling effect on U.S.-Cuban relations.
Castro fears an end to the embargo. He knows the day the embargo falls is the day he runs out of excuses. Without the embargo, Castro would have no one to blame for the failing Cuban economy.
Nor would his way of governing be able to survive the influx of Americans and democratic ideas that would flood his island if the embargo were lifted.
Now, some Cuba watchers have predicted that the dissident arrests and the resulting decline of U.S.-Cuba relations are a death knell to the engagement debate in Washington.
I strongly disagree. And I think now, more than ever, a genuine, honest debate about the merits of the embargo is needed.
Some people seem to think tightening the embargo is a rational response to the Castro regime. I guess if you think an embargo can hurt Castro without hurting the Cuban people, then tightening the embargo might make some sense.
But it does not work that way. The embargo actually hurts the Cuban people much more than it hurts Castro.
This is why many Cuban dissidents, including Oswaldo Paya, the founder of the Varela Project, oppose our embargo and support engagement.
Indeed, after 43 years, it ought to be clear to everyone that the embargo has failed to weaken Castro. A better approach is to reach out to the Cuban people. Ending the travel ban is the first and best way to do this.
If Castro fears contact between the Cuban people and the American people, the rational American response is to send more Americans, not fewer.
Of course, ending the travel ban would have benefits not only for the Cuban people, but also for Americans. Ending the travel ban would have an immediate and direct economic impact, beyond even the immediate travel sector.
Most importantly for my home state of Montana, ending the travel ban would help farmers and ranchers.
Americans are currently allowed to sell food and medicine to Cuba on a cash basis. But there is a lot of red tape thrown in their way. And without the ability to travel to Cuba and develop the business contacts, the full potential of these sales is not realized.
In fact, one study has suggested that lifting the travel ban could result in an additional quarter billion dollars of agricultural sales, and create thousands of new jobs.
Ending the travel ban would bring benefits to both Cubans and to Americans. And that, after all, is what this debate should be about. Supporters of the embargo are so focused on hurting Castro that they actually strengthen him--at the expense of the Cuban people, and at the expense of our own economy.
I hope my colleagues will join me in co-sponsoring this important legislation. I believe it is the best way to show that we truly care about the Cuban people And indeed, if we truly care about democracy, then let us send Cuba exactly that. Let us travel to Cuba and show them democracy in action.
I yield the floor.