Videos

The Federalist Society held a panel discussion to analyze the Supreme Court oral arguments for Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North…

Legal experts talked about the 2000 Bush v. Gore U.S. Supreme Court case, including the decision’s merits, the precedents it set, and whether the ruling was driven by partisan politics.

Republican lawyers talked about the federal judicial confirmation process and how it changed with President Trump’s nomination of Neil Gorsuch to be a Supreme Court justice. After the discus…

Wade Henderson and Curt Levey talked about President Obama’s nomination of D.C. Court of Appeals Chief Judge Merrick Garland to succeed the late Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, …

Panelists talked about several issues they felt were significant and had been under-reported by media sources in the primary election cycle. Topics included political scandals, problems in t…

Ms. Charen moderated a panel discussion on the U.S. Supreme Court nomination of Judge Samuel Alito. Panelists discussed the Committee for Justice’s new white paper on the anti-Alito coalitio…

Following Supreme Court Oral Arguments of two University of Michigan admissions policy cases, some of the parties involved spoke to reporters on the plaza in front of the Supreme Court.

On April 1, 2003 the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the cases of Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger, two legal actions challenging the affirmative action policies at the…