Center for American Progress' Emily Gee and Cato Institute's Michael Cannon discuss the role health care will play in the upcoming campaign and U.S. Special Envoy to Yemen Timothy Lenderking discusses Houthi strikes in the Red Sea.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in NRA v. Vullo, a case on whether a former New York regulator violated the NRA's free speech rights by threatening companies that do business with them. In 2017, Maria Vullo, the then superintendent of the Department of Financial Services investigated the NRA-endorsed Carry Guard affinity insurance program. This program, underwritten and administered by third parties, covered members' financial losses and if needed, criminal defense costs from use of a licensed firearm. The investigation concluded it violated state law. In February 2018 following a deadly Florida school shooting, Ms. Vullo met with companies urging them to end or rethink their ties with the gun group. AIG and other companies, including the ones associated with the Carry Guard program severed or reduced ties with the NRA. The NRA filed suit arguing Ms. Vullo's actions violated its First Amendment right to protected speech as a gun rights organization. The Supreme Court has through
The House will hold a brief session. No votes will take place until Tuesday, April 9. Members are currently on a district work period over the spring recess.
Iranga Kahangama, assistant homeland security secretary for cyber, infrastructure, risk and resilience, discusses election security and integrity during a conversation hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Up-to-date highlights from candidates' speeches, interviews with political insiders, the latest poll numbers, fundraising stats, and political ads. Witness the campaign unfold in every episode. This week, a look at independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s vice presidential pick, President Biden and Vice President Harris in North Carolina, and a preview of Montana's 2024 U.S. Senate election.
NYU professor Jonathan Haidt argued that technology is harming the social development and mental health of children. He was interviewed by Harvard University Center for Digital Thriving co-director and author Emily Weinstein.
NYU professor Jonathan Haidt argued that technology is harming the social development and mental health of children. He was interviewed by Harvard University Center for Digital Thriving co-director and author Emily Weinstein.
Lisel Petis, resident senior fellow for criminal justice and civil liberties at the R Street Institute, discusses bail reform efforts around the country, and Ipsos Public Affairs President Cliff Young discusses polling and Campaign 2024.
"The Soul of Civility" author Alexandra Hudson and Alexander Heffner, host of the Bloomberg TV series "Breaking Bread," discuss efforts to promote civility in politics and in American life.
Up-to-date highlights from candidates' speeches, interviews with political insiders, the latest poll numbers, fundraising stats, and political ads. Witness the campaign unfold in every episode. This week, a look at independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s vice presidential pick, President Biden and Vice President Harris in North Carolina, and a preview of Montana's 2024 U.S. Senate election.
Over thirty-two hundred students from across the country participated in the 20-year anniversary of C-SPAN's Student Cam documentary competition. All this month, we featured our top 21 winning entries.
Dean Baker of the Center for Economic & Policy Research discusses policies to address the nation's affordable housing shortage and Prohuman Foundation's Daryl Davis and Letitia Kim discuss efforts to improve civility in the U.S.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Ohio v. EPA, a case consolidated with three others concerning the EPA's authority to establish national air quality standards. In 2015, the EPA made changes to the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone. Under the Clean Air Act's "good neighbor" provision states have three years to respond with their own plan for implementation and compliance. The EPA rejected more than 20 states' plans. They then proposed their own federal "Good Neighbor Plan" which became effective August 4, 2023. Several states and industries filed suits challenging the new federal plan arguing it violates the Administrative Procedure Act. They asked a federal court to stay the "Good Neighbor Plan" while the case moved through the legal system. The stay was denied, and the parties appealed to the Supreme Court. The justices now have through June 2024 to issue a ruling.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument for more than two hours in Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce, a case that could result in the weakening of federal agencies' rulemaking process and their ability to interpret laws for implementation. At the center of this case and another is the Chevron doctrine. Under it, courts defer to federal agencies to interpret unclear or ambiguous statutes. The Supreme Court has through June 2024 to decide whether to overturn this doctrine or keep it.
The Supreme Court heard a second oral argument in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, a case that could also result in the weakening of federal agencies rulemaking process and their ability to interpret laws for implementation. At the center of this case and another is the Chevron doctrine. Under it, courts defer to federal agencies to interpret unclear or ambiguous statutes. The Supreme Court has through June 2024 to decide whether to overturn this doctrine or keep it.
Over thirty-two hundred students from across the country participated in the 20-year anniversary of C-SPAN's Student Cam documentary competition. All this month, we featured our top 21 winning entries.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case challenging a new tax under a Trump-era law. In 2005, Charles Moore, the petitioner in this case, invested in KisanKraft, a business based in India. The company is a controlled foreign corporation meaning 50% or more of it is owned by Americans. Mr. Moore and his wife invested $40,000 and in turn received 11% of the company's shares. Through the years, there was considerable company growth but the Moores didn't have to pay taxes on the earnings from it. This changed with the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which has a one-time, Mandatory Repatriation Tax (MRT) on earnings from controlled foreign corporations. The Moores argued the new tax violated the 16th Amendment because it taxed unrealized earnings. Congress and the federal government were monitoring this case closely because a ruling could impact future tax policy. Also on the line is more than $330 billion in tax revenue expected to be generated from the provision. The Supreme Court has
Over thirty-two hundred students from across the country participated in the 20-year anniversary of C-SPAN's Student Cam documentary competition. All this month, we featured our top 21 winning entries.
Can the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) regulate bump stocks like machine guns, which are illegal and banned under federal law? That's what the Supreme Court is considering after hearing arguments from both sides for more than an hour in Garland v. Cargil. The Trump administration enacted a bump stock ban in 2018. The action was in response to a 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas during a music festival. The gunman used a bump stock with his rifle to kill 58 people and wounded more than 400 others. This was the United States' deadliest mass shooting in history. Shortly after the ban's enactment, Michael Cargill, an owner of two bump stocks, filed suit. After multiple rounds of going through the lower courts, the Supreme Court now has through June 2024 to issue a ruling.
Over thirty-two hundred students from across the country participated in the 20-year anniversary of C-SPAN's Student Cam documentary competition. All this month, we featured our top 21 winning entries.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case on whether people under domestic violence protective orders can have guns. Currently, under federal law this is prohibited. In 2020 a Texas court issued a two-year order and revoked the gun license of Zackey Rahimi. Ms. C.M. requested it after a 2019 incident where he allegedly threatened her and pushed her inside a car. Also, Mr. Rahimi allegedly fired his gun at a witness. After this incident he reportedly continued making gun threats against Ms. C.M. After the order was in place, police investigated multiple shootings with Mr. Rahimi as the suspect. Police searched and found guns in his home. Mr. Rahimi was prosecuted for violating the federal statute banning guns while under a domestic violence order. Mr. Rahimi claimed his Second Amendment rights were violated. The federal government disagreed and argued they met the burden of proof to regulate gun access of domestic abusers. The Supreme Court has through June 2024 to issue a ruling.
Over thirty-two hundred students from across the country participated in the 20-year anniversary of C-SPAN's Student Cam documentary competition. All this month, we featured our top 21 winning entries.