Supreme Court Term Review, Property Rights

Sep 18, 2012


0

Cato Institute

Legal scholars talked about property rights decisions during the 2011-12 Supreme Court term, focusing on Sackett v. EPA. In the case the Sackett family planned to build a house on land they purchased in Idaho. They received an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notice that saying the property was subject to the Clean Water Act and that they had illegally placed fill material on their land. The panelists argued against government agencies and EPA policies.
This forum was part of the Cato Institute’s annual publication of its review of the Supreme Court term and it Constitution Day celebration.
Legal scholars talked about property rights decisions during the 2011-12 Supreme Court term, focusing on Sackett v. EPA. In the case the Sackett family planned to build a house on land they purchased in Idaho. They received an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notice that saying the property was subject to the Clean Water Act and that they had illegally placed fill material on their land. The panelists argued against government agencies and EPA policies.
This forum was part of the Cato Institute’s annual publication of its review of the Supreme Court term and it Constitution Day celebration.

1 hour, 18 minutes | 275 Views

Loading...

SOCIAL MEDIA

PURCHASE

Loading...

PEOPLE GRID LIST

  • Somin, Ilya
  • Adler, Jonathan H.
  • Schiff, Damien
  • Pilon, Roger
  • Unidentified Speaker,
  • Somin, Ilya

    Professor George Mason University->School of Law
    22:43 of 01:18:35
  • Adler, Jonathan H.

    Director Case Western Reserve University->Center for Business Law and Regulation
    22:40 of 01:18:35
  • Schiff, Damien

    Attorney Pacific Legal Foundation
    21:47 of 01:18:35
  • Pilon, Roger

    Vice President Cato Institute->Legal Affairs
    07:29 of 01:18:35
  • 02:01 of 01:18:35