| Part Of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals - Nordyke v. King
Report Video IssueNordyke v. King Oral Argument
2009-01-26T11:15:55-05:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNDBhXC8yODM0NjgtMDItbS5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals head oral arguments in the case of Nordyke v. King et al. in which gun show operators Russell and Sallie Nordyke appealed a ban of firearms from the Alameda County Fairgrounds that did not except gun shows. Mary King was one of the members of the Alamed County Board of Supervisors named in the suite. The plaintiffs contended that the ban violates their First Amendment right of free speech and their Second Amendment right to bear arms, as well as the due process clause as other groups were allowed to have guns on the fairgrounds. The plaintiffs also argued that the individual right to bear arms recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller must be recognized by states and not just the federal government under the 14th Amendment.
Judge Gould participated via video link.
Judge Gould participated via video link.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals head oral arguments in the case of Nordyke v. King et al. in which gun show operators Russell and Sallie … read more
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals head oral arguments in the case of Nordyke v. King et al. in which gun show operators Russell and Sallie Nordyke appealed a ban of firearms from the Alameda County Fairgrounds that did not except gun shows. Mary King was one of the members of the Alamed County Board of Supervisors named in the suite. The plaintiffs contended that the ban violates their First Amendment right of free speech and their Second Amendment right to bear arms, as well as the due process clause as other groups were allowed to have guns on the fairgrounds. The plaintiffs also argued that the individual right to bear arms recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller must be recognized by states and not just the federal government under the 14th Amendment.
Judge Gould participated via video link. close
People in this video
-
-
-
T. Peter Pierce Attorney
Hosting Organization
Series
More Videos From
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals - Nordyke v. King
More Videos
Purchase a Download
Nordyke v. King Oral Argument
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Gun Show Ban Case
San Francisco Chronicle reporter Bob Egelko spoke by telephone about the background of the case Nordyke v. King, argued …
-
District of Columbia Handgun Ban
Paul Helmke and Stephen Halbrook debated the previoius day’s U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in the case of District o…
-
District of Columbia v. Heller Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, docket number 07-290, in which a 19…
-
District of Columbia v. Heller Reactions
Representatives of the District of Columbia and Mr. Heller and his attorneys spoke to reporters separately. They answere…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 13 seconds
- 16 views