Judging Science
Authors Peter Huber and Kenneth Foster of Judging Science, and Patrick Malone, Attorney at Stein, Mitchell & Mezines, debated whether judges… read more
Authors Peter Huber and Kenneth Foster of Judging Science, and Patrick Malone, Attorney at Stein, Mitchell & Mezines, debated whether judges or juries should decide what is acceptable scientific evidence in court proceedings. Scientific evidence is often used in court proceedings and can be highly controversial given the little relative knowledge citizens have about science. Following the debate, the panelists answered questions from the audience. close
People in this video
- Michael Gough Director Cato Institute->Science and Risk Studies
- Patrick Malone Attorney
Hosting Organization
Related Video
-
End of Sanity
Author, Martin Gross, gave a book talk at Borders Book Store in Stamford, CT. Mr. Gross spoke about his book, "The End o…
-
Imagining the Law
Norman Cantor talked about his book, "Imagining the Law: Common Law and the Foundations of the American Legal System". T…
-
Endless Frontier
Mr. Zachary talked about his book, Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century. The book utilizes …
-
Redeeming Culture
James Gilbert talked about his new book, Redeeming Culture: American Religion in an Age of Science. It examines the cult…