Newspaper Confidentiality: Cohen v. Cowles
The Supreme Court heard arguments this week in Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.. The justices will decide if newspapers can be held liable for brea… read more
The Supreme Court heard arguments this week in Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.. The justices will decide if newspapers can be held liable for breaking promises of confidentiality made by reporters, or if the papers are protected from such suits by the First Amendment. In 1982 Bill Salisbury, a reporter, received information from a source, Dan Cohen, with the promise of confidentiality and anonymity. The editors overruled Mr. Salisbury’s promise and printed Mr. Cohen’s name. Reporters interviewed participants in the case on the steps of the Supreme Court. Later in 1991, the Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case, stating newspapers could be held responsible for damages for breaking promises of confidentiality made by reporters of the newspaper. close
People in this video
-
John French Attorney
-
Elliot Rothenberg Attorney
Hosting Organization
Related Video
-
Support for Judge Thomas Nomination
The conservative political groups Citizens United and the Conservative Victory Committee held a joint news conference to…
-
Supreme Court Stakeout: Lee v. Weisman
Participants in the proceedings of the Supreme Court case Lee v. Weisman responded to reporters' questions outside the S…
-
Reporters' Confidentiality Case
Mr. Abrams, attorney for New York Times correspondent Judith Miller, and Mr. Keller spoke to reporters about the Central…
-
FCC v. Fox Television Reactions
Carter Phillips, the attorney representing Fox Television, spoke to the press after the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral ar…