Debate on Confidentiality of Sources
A debate was held on the question: “Should the Law Protect Reporters from Having to Disclose Confidential Sources?” Speaking for the affirm… read more
A debate was held on the question: “Should the Law Protect Reporters from Having to Disclose Confidential Sources?” Speaking for the affirmative: Judith Miller, a New York Times reporter involved in the Wilson/Plame investigation; Robert Bertsche; and David Rini. Speaking for the negative: former U.S. Attorney Joseph DiGenova; former Deputy Asst. U.S. Attorney General Victoria Toensing; and Nick Barber. The affirmative position was declared the winner by audience vote. close
People in this video
-
Robert Bertsche Attorney
-
Joseph E. diGenova Attorney
-
Victoria Toensing Attorney
Hosting Organization
Related Video
-
Confidentiality of Sources
Ms. Dalglish talked about the confidentiality of reporters' sources and the decision in the lawsuit against New York Tim…
-
Confidentiality of Reporters' Sources
Ms. Toensing discussed the issue of the confidentiality of reporters' sources and its relation to the case of the New Yo…
-
Confidentiality of Reporters' Sources
Ms. Cochran discussed her desire to see the federal government pass a “Federal Shield Law” that would provide an absolut…
-
Journalism and Confidential Sources
Mr. Keller talked about the use of confidential sources by journalists, the jailing of reporter Judith Miller for not re…