<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Roger Pilon Recent C-SPAN Appearances</title>
    <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/person/5798</link>
    <description>Roger Pilon's recent appearances from the C-SPAN networks</description>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2013, National Cable Satellite Corporation</copyright>
    <managingEditor>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:42:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <category>C-SPAN Person Recent Appearances</category>
    
    <item>
      <title>European Union Debt Crisis</title>
      <description>Former Czech Republic President Vaclav Klaus and Uri Dadush talked about economic questions facing the European Union. Former President Klaus outlined steps taken by the European Union to alleviate the debt crisis, but predicted further economic hardship for Europe and the global economy.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311422-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311422-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Book Discussion on [Mismatch]</title>
      <description>Law professor Richard Sander and former [New York Times] correspondent Stuart Taylor talked about their book, [Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts the Students It's Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won't Admit It]. They also presented their thoughts on affirmative action prior to the Supreme Court's hearing of oral arguments in [Fisher v. University of Texas]. They said that they agreed with the initial goals of affirmative action but now believe the system hurts more than helps minorities. Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor speak at the CATO Institute in Washington, D.C. They responded to questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308688-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308688-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:01:43 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court 2012-2013 Term Preview</title>
      <description>Panelists previewed the 2012-13 Supreme Court term. Potential cases included a University of Texas affirmative action case and 4th Amendment unreasonable search cases. There are also cases the Supreme Court could take this term on issues such as the Voting Rights Act and same-sex marriage. 
This forum was part of the Cato Institute's annual publication of its review of the Supreme Court term and it Constitution Day celebration.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-4</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-4</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:47:51 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Term Review, Health Care Law</title>
      <description>Legal analysts and experts reviewed the Supreme Court's ruling on the Affordable Care Act, the health care law. They analyzed the various aspects of the cases involved in the decision: Chief Justice Roberts' interpretation of the Commerce Clause and the individual mandate, the expansion of Medicaid, and the Anti-Injunction Act, a law that prohibited courts from striking down tax laws before they take effect. All of the panelists were against the health care law.
This forum was part of the Cato Institute's annual publication of its review of the Supreme Court term and it Constitution Day celebration.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 22:25:44 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Term Review, Property Rights</title>
      <description>Legal scholars talked about property rights decisions during the 2011-12 Supreme Court term, focusing on [Sackett v. EPA]. In the case the Sackett family planned to build a house on land they purchased in Idaho. They received an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notice that saying the property was subject to the Clean Water Act and that they had illegally placed fill material on their land. The panelists argued against government agencies and EPA policies.
This forum was part of the Cato Institute's annual publication of its review of the Supreme Court term and it Constitution Day celebration.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-2</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-2</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:00:43 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Health Care Decision</title>
      <description>Legal experts talked about the Supreme Court's ruling that upheld the Affordable Care Act, the health care law. The three panelists, all of whom oppose the legislation, discussed the role of government in health care, constitutional issues, tax issues, and the 2012 elections. They responded to questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306875-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306875-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 07:29:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>States' Rights and the Tenth Amendment</title>
      <description>Roger Pilon and Louis Michael Seidman talked about the Tenth Amendment and states' rights. They discussed what the Tenth Amendment entails and the concept of states' rights, the Supreme Court case regarding Arizona's immigration law, and who is responsible for immigration policy. They responded to phone calls and electronic communications.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305716-5</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Call-In</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305716-5</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:03:22 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Health Care Law Challenge Preview, Individual Mandate</title>
      <description>Panelists previewed the Supreme Court oral arguments on the constitutionality of the 2010 health care law requirement that people purchase health care coverage by 2014 or face a financial penalty. Michael Cannon and Randy Barnett reasoned that the mandate is unconstitutional, with Mr. Barnett calling it "unprecedented," "uncabined," "unnecessary," and "dangerous." Elizabeth Wydra argued that the requirement is constitutional on the grounds of the interstate commerce and necessary and proper clauses. Afterward, they answered questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305060-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305060-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:51:07 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Health Care Law Challenge Preview, Medicare and the States</title>
      <description>Panelists previewed the Supreme Court oral arguments on state sovereignty in the Medicaid expansion provision of the 2010 health care law.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305060-2</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305060-2</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:59:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Challenges to the 2010 Health Care Law</title>
      <description>Jan Crawford moderated a discussion on legal challenges to the 2010  health care law between Roger Pilon and Neera Tanden. Mr. Pilon argued that the law is unconstitutional. Ms. Tanden talked about her experiences working to pass the bill while advising Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius  and her belief that the Supreme Court will uphold the law's individual mandate provision.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/298591-3</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/298591-3</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gun Rights and the Courts</title>
      <description>Panelists talked about U.S. courts and future cases on gun rights. Topics included recent Supreme Court decisions on an individual's right to bear arms and the right of state and local governments to enforce gun laws. They also responded to questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/297621-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/297621-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 03:35:48 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>House Republicans and the Constitution</title>
      <description>Roger Pilon talked about  the reading of the U.S. Constitution on the House floor, including protests of certain sections of the document that were left out, and plans by House Republicans to cite sections of the Constitution when crafting bills. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/297370-4</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Call-In</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/297370-4</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 13:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2010 Public Policy Perspectives, Part 2</title>
      <description>Cato Institute fellows talked about a variety of issues including health care reform, constitutional law, international trade, and U.S. foreign relations.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/293518-2</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/293518-2</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 13:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Second Amendment Rights and States</title>
      <description>Participants talked about gun control laws and a Supreme Court case scheduled to be argued the following day.
In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court, in [District of Columbia v. Heller], struck down Washington, D.C.'s ban on handguns and found that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. On March 2, 2010, in [McDonald v. City of Chicago], the Court will hear oral arguments on whether that right applies to states and localities. The Court is expected to hold that it does: a key purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified at the height of Reconstruction in 1868, was to allow newly freed slaves and white Unionists to defend themselves against Southern reprisals by protecting their right to keep and bear arms. But if the Court reaches that result via the Due Process Clause or the Privileges or Immunities Clause, which was specifically enacted to protect various individual rights, including particularly the right to armed self-defense, would help determine the future of gun rights in America and also constitutional law generally, because it could lead to the re-invigoration of a variety of important liberties that courts have long neglected.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/292308-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/292308-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:44:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Book Discussion on [The Tie Goes to Freedom]</title>
      <description>Helen Knowles talked about [The Tie Goes to Freedom: Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on Liberty] (Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.; January 28, 2009). In her book she gives a full examination of the jurisprudence of Justice Kennedy, who has been the tie-breaking vote in 5-4 decisions more often than any other Justice since the retirement of Justice O'Connor. Her mentor, Professor Randy Barnett, made comments afterward, and then Professor Knowles responded to his remarks and audience members' questions.
 
 Ms. Knowles received the 2005 U.S. Supreme Court Historical Society Hughes Gossett Award as a teaching fellow at Boston University, where she also earned her Ph.D.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/284975-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/284975-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:01:19 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Book Discussion on [Little Pink House]</title>
      <description>A panel discussion was held on Jeff Benedict's book, [Little Pink House: A True Story of Defiance and Courage] (Grand Central Publishing; January 26, 2009). The book is about Susette Kelo's eminent domain battle to keep her house in Connecticut. She lost her appeal of [Kelo v. City of New London] to U.S. Supreme Court, which inspired the change of eminent domain laws of 42 states. Ms. Kelo and Scott Bullock, who argued the losing eminent domain case before the Supreme Court, also spoke. The panelists responded to audience members' questions following their remarks. Roger Pilon moderated.
 
 Jeff Benedict is a contributing writer for [Sports Illustrated], the [Los Angeles Times], and the [Hartford Courant]. He's author of seven books, including [Pros and Cons: The Criminals Who Play in the NFL] and [Out of Bounds: Inside the NBA's Culture of Rape, Violence and Crime]. Mr. Benedict teaches advanced writing and a class on politics and the law at Southern Virginia University. He holds a J.D., an M.A. in Political Science and a B.A. in History. Mr. Benedict previously practiced law in Connecticut.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/283704-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/283704-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:01:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Libertarian Policy and the Constitution</title>
      <description>Randy Barnett talked about the role of libertarian ideology in the U.S. Constitution. He talked about the history of libertarians. He argued that the Constitution was intended to limit the power and roles of the government.
 
 The topic of the lecture was "Is the Constitution Libertarian?"</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/281173-5</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/281173-5</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:15:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International Law and Combating Terrorism</title>
      <description>The panel talked about the 2007 Supreme Court term, focusing on the state of Guantanamo Bay detainees and the ability of the federal government to regulate energy markets. They talked about the legal questions surrounding the War on Terror and the Supreme Court's opinions on the War on Terror, specifically the balance of powers. They answered questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/281173-2</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/281173-2</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Review</title>
      <description>The Supremem Court: Past &amp; Prologue</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/281173-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/281173-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Joe Madison Show</title>
      <description>A live simulcast of the Joe Madison's "The Black Eagle" show was shown. Topics included the Supreme Court ruling that overturned the D.C. gun ban, sex trafficking, and truckers' reaction to fuel prices.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/206237-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/206237-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:01:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Term Review</title>
      <description>Legal scholars talked about several recent cases and actions before the U.S. Supreme Court during its 2006 term. They focused on issues related to civil rights, Affirmative Action, late term abortion, and property rights. Additionally, they talked about how precedents in recent cases might affect outcomes in related matters before federal courts. They also responded to questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200780-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200780-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:45:51 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court  2007 Term Preview</title>
      <description>Looking forward to the October 2007 U.S. Supreme Court term, each panelist surveyed the cases already on the Court's docket and those expected to be granted review. Issues included child pornography, the District of Columbia gun ban, the dormant commerce clause, presidential power to compel states to comply with treaty obligations, the meaning of "use" of a firearm during a crime, the constitutionality of a law barring habeas corpus claims by Guantanamo detainees, and federal preemption of state tobacco laws. After their presentations the panelists responded to audience members' questions. 
  
 This session was part of the symposium, "The Supreme Court: Past and Prologue: A Look at the October 2006 and October 2007 Terms."</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200780-4</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200780-4</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Cases on First Amendment Issues</title>
      <description>Legal scholars spoke about free speech and First Amendment cases heard by the Supreme Court in the 2006-2007 term. Among the topics they addressed were campaign finance reform laws, political advertising, federal faith-based programs, union dues and participation in union activities, and speech issues in the schools. Mr. Shapiro moderated the panel which responded to questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200780-3</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200780-3</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:47:46 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Executive Power in Wartime</title>
      <description>Judge Pryor moderated a panel discussion on the federalist approach to executive power in wartime. The panelists addressed questions such as whether President Bush has acted legally in regard the war in Iraq, whether Congress has exceeded its constitutional powers, and what role if any the Judiciary should have in mediating these disputes? Topics included the Separation of Powers, the National Guard, executive power in wartime, and the role of the commander-in-chief. After their presentations the panelists responded to audience members' questions.
 
 This event was part of the Federalist Society's annual National Lawyers Convention. The theme of the convention was "Limited Government." 
 
 Judge Pryor was misidentified on screen as 'Jude William Pryor.'</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195433-2</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195433-2</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 23:32:54 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Presidential War Powers</title>
      <description>Panelists spoke about presidential powers during times of war and the Bush administration's use of executive power in efforts to combat global terrorism and pursue military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq. Among the issues they addressed were the history and practice of constitutional separation of powers, various uses of executive power during previous times of war, the evolution of legal interpretation of the powers given to the commander-in-chief by the Constitution, and legal precedents in judicial decisions governing presidential war powers. Following their remarks they answered questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191667-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191667-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 01:00:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Book Discussion on [How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution]</title>
      <description>Richard Epstein talked about his book [How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution], published by Cato Institute. He argued that the U.S. Constitution was essentially rewritten, without benefit of amendment, as Progressives replaced competitive markets with government-created cartels and monopolies. Professor Seidman critiqued Professor Epstein speech and book. After their remarks both men answered audience members' questions.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191248-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191248-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:39:28 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Nomination</title>
      <description>Conservatives participated in a panel discussion on the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court. They offered conservative perspectives on the nomination and debated the role of the Supreme Court. Following their discussion, the panelists responded to questions and comments from members of the audience. Mr. Fitter moderated the panel.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190038-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190038-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Judge Roberts and the Constitution</title>
      <description>Professor Seidman and Mr. Pilon talked about the interpretation of the Constitution and privacy rights. They discussed U.S. Supreme Court nominee John Roberts' past views on these issues. The guests also responded to questions and comments from telephone callers.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/188543-3</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Call-In</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/188543-3</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 12:35:34 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Judical Nominations</title>
      <description>Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) and others held a press conference with members of the legal community to discuss Senate consideration of judicial nominations, as well as the use of filibuster ruses in the confirmation process. Following their remarks they answered questions from the reporters.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/186878-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>News Conference</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/186878-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 17:24:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Internet Pharmacies and Drug Importation</title>
      <description>Dr. Carmona testified about the availability of prescription drugs, distribution over the Internet, foreign sources of drugs, and safety concerns with various drug distribution systems. A panel of witnesses then testified about prescription drug prices and their effect on the elderly, pharmacists, and others.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/185287-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Senate Committee</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/185287-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:32:23 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Congress and the Courts</title>
      <description>Mr. Pilon moderated a panel discussion on the relationship between Congress and the federal judiciary. The panelists discussed the jurisdictional disputes between the legislative and judicial branches, and addressed the question of whether Congress has limited the independence of the judiciary. They spoke about mandatory sentencing laws, judicial nominations, and judicial review. The panelists responded to questions from members of the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/184466-3</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/184466-3</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Civil Liberties</title>
      <description>Justice Saunders talked about civil liberties, focusing on the role of state courts and state constitutions in protecting liberty and individual rights and freedoms. He said that limited government was essential to protect the rights of citizens and that state constitutions and courts did have an important role to play in protecting individual freedoms from encroachment by governments, but that many state courts had not been fulfilling their responsibilities in this area. Following prepared remarks, he responded to questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/177742-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/177742-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2003 11:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Ruling on Affirmative Actioin</title>
      <description>Mr. Pilon spoke via telephone about the Supreme Court's decision in two cases involving Affirmative Action programs at the University of Michigan. The court upheld admissions practices at the university's law school while striking down undergraduate admissions practices which used a point system to evaluate minority applicants.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/177167-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Interview</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/177167-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 03:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Book Discussion on [Wild Bill:  The Legend and Life of William O. Douglas]</title>
      <description>Mr. Murphy discussed his book [Wild Bill:  The Legend and Life of William O. Douglas, America's Most Controversial Supreme Court Justice], published by Random House. Justice Douglas was the second youngest judge to serve on the high court and stayed on the bench for the longest duration. Professor Murphy argues that the legend of Douglas differs greatly from reality and that Douglas' memoirs are largely fabricated. He talked specifically about Douglas' claims that he had polio as a child, that he grew up poor, that he served in France during WWI, and that he had little interest in becoming president. Professor Murphy also talked about Douglas' career as a Supreme Court justice and his eventual move towards libertarianism. Mr. Swanson provided commentary. Following their presentations they answered questions from members of the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/162037-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/162037-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 04:00:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Future of Affirmative Action in Higher Education</title>
      <description>On April 1, 2003 the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the cases of Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger, two legal actions challenging the affirmative action policies at the University of Michigan Law School and undergraduate college. The panel, including attorneys for the plaintiffs, defense, and amici curiae, will discuss the competing legal arguments and the political, social, and educational implications of the Supreme Court's ultimate decision. Professor Ashar moderated the panel.
 
 America and the Courts shows part of the forum.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/175263-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/175263-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2003 07:10:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Judicial Confirmation Process</title>
      <description>Participants talked about the Senate's judicial confirmation process and the role of the nominee's political ideology. Following their remarks they answered questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/168229-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/168229-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:00:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Privacy Act and the Presidency</title>
      <description>Witnesses testified about the extent to which the Privacy Act applied to the office of the president. Among the topics they addressed were similarities in jurisdiction between the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act, pending matters on the issue before the courts, and potential legislation to define the scope of the act.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/159138-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>House Committee</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/159138-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2000 07:08:43 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Presidential Primaries and Campaign Finance</title>
      <description>Witnesses testified about possible campaign finance reform legislation, including measures to rotate regional primary systems, enhance criminal penalties of legislative abuses, and raising the contribution limits for presidential campaigns.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/156289-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Senate Committee</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/156289-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:16:30 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Campaign Finance Reform</title>
      <description>Participants talked to reporters about their concern over the campaign finance reform debate in Congress. They talked about the amount of campaign funds are needed to get the message out to the American people, and lack of information could harm the representative democracy. They also stressed that the reforms would provide another form of incumbent security for Congressman preventing challengers from raising large amounts of money. After their prepared remarks they answered questions from reporters.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/152711-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>News Conference</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/152711-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1999 04:17:40 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Slaughterhouse Cases</title>
      <description>Participants discussed the legacy of the slaughterhouse cases which dealt with the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. They focused particularly on the strict interpretation of the "privileges and immunities" clause and how this has led to interpretive conflicts over other parts of the amendment, including the "due process" clause, which impact the boundaries of state versus federal government. They also took questions from the audience. The Supreme Court handed down its decision in the slaughterhouse cases 125 years ago.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/103672-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/103672-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1998 16:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Constitutional Amendment Process</title>
      <description>Professors and law scholars debated how often and under what circumstances the Constitution should be amended. The panelists gave opening statements and then debated the various issues. Following that, they answered questions posed by members of the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/95514-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/95514-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 1997 19:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Medical Marijuana Referenda</title>
      <description>Subcommittee members heard testimony from General McCaffrey, anti-drug experts and legalized marijuana advocates on referenda in Arizona and California which approved marijuana for medical use. General McCaffrey and others stressed that such laws create conditions for increased drug abuse and that other drugs can provide the same relief as marijuana and the proponents of medical marijuana stressed the need for the use of marijuana to help patients when other drugs cannot or are too expensive.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/92280-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>House Committee</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/92280-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 1997 20:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Campaign Finance Reform Day 3</title>
      <description>Committee members heard testimony from legal scholars on the legal complications of campaign finance reform.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/96248-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Senate Committee</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/96248-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 1997 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Book Discussion on [Boerne, TX v. Flores]</title>
      <description>Two attorneys discussed the [Boerne, TX v. Flores], which the Supreme Court heard on February 19. The archbishop of San Antonio, who had requested permission to tear down an old church building and build a new one and was denied by a local ordinance on historic preservation, sued the city of Boerne, TX under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which became law in 1993. This case involves issues both of the exercise of religious freedom and the separation of powers, specifically the authority of Congress to overturn judicial decisions through legislation. After their presentations, they responded to each other's remarks.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/78976-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/78976-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 1997 23:59:42 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Limitation Amendment Part 2</title>
      <description>Committee members heard testimony on S.J. Res. 8, a proposed amendment to the Constitution to prohibit retroactive increases in taxes. The amendment would require a "super majority" two-thirds vote in Congress to pass legislation that would increase taxes. Committee member Senator Coverdell also testified.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/71241-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Senate Committee</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/71241-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1996 06:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court and Civil Rights</title>
      <description>This session was entitled, "Color-Blindness v. Racial Justice: The Supreme Court's 1994-95 Term and the Struggle to Define Equal Protection."</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/67265-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/67265-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 1995 03:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Civil Rights Aspects of Health Care Reform</title>
      <description>The commission heard witnesses testify on the civil rights aspects of health care reform. Rather than analyze the specifics for an efficient system, they addressed concerns of minority groups and how they would be affected. The Commission on Civil Rights reports and makes recommendations to Congress and the President on federal laws and policies that affect civil rights.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/55050-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/55050-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 1994 01:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Law of Term Limits</title>
      <description>The panelists debated the policy implications of the term limits movement and the prospect for legal challenges.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/53311-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/53311-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 1993 21:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Presidential Appointments</title>
      <description>Recent articles have asserted that the process of presidential appointments has become more politicized in the last twenty years than ever before. The guests discussed whether this is so and what it means for the efficiency of government due to large numbers of unfilled positions. They also discussed the political processes and agendas of various partisan groups. Professor Schwartz is the author of \f2Packing the Courts: The Conservative Campaign to Rewrite the Constitution.\fR</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/53307-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Call-In</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/53307-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 1993 00:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Union Political Activity</title>
      <description>The guest discussed the Executive Order signed by the President. The Executive Order directed federal contractors to inform nonunion employees who pay union dues that they are entitled to refunds on the part of their dues that the unions use for political activity they do not support.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/25630-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Call-In</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/25630-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 1992 22:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
