<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Paul Gewirtz Recent C-SPAN Appearances</title>
    <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/person/2684</link>
    <description>Paul Gewirtz's recent appearances from the C-SPAN networks</description>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2013, National Cable Satellite Corporation</copyright>
    <managingEditor>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:34:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <category>C-SPAN Person Recent Appearances</category>
    
    <item>
      <title>Chinese Rule of Law</title>
      <description>Former U.S. Ambassador to China Jon Hunstman talked about the rule of law in China. He was joined in discussion by law professors from Yale, Harvard, and New York University. They responded to questions from members of the audience.
"Prospects and Challenges for Rule of Law" was a session of the Brookings Institution event "Rule of Law in China: Prospects and Challenges" to launch Professor He Weifang's book [In the Name of Justice: Striving for the Rule of Law in China].</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309651-2</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Public Affairs Event</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309651-2</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:44:39 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bork Nomination Day 9, Part 5</title>
      <description>The panel of law professors expressed opposition to the nomination. Professor Fiss called Bork's judicial philosophy -majoritarianism- because of its de-emphasis of individual liberties. Professor Grey addressed five Bork myths arising from the confirmation hearings. He concluded that Bork's academic writing could not be separated from his probable actions as a Supreme Court justice, that Bork's views have not changed, and that they were not tentative. Professor Resnik looked at Bork's character as an appeals court judge and found it lacking.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/10178-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category>Senate Committee</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/10178-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 1987 06:48:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
