http://www.c-spanvideo.org/person/16329 Carter G. Phillips's recent appearances from the C-SPAN networks en-US Copyright 2013, National Cable Satellite Corporation info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Sat, 25 May 2013 02:38:32 GMT C-SPAN Person Recent Appearances http://www.c-spanvideo.org/videoLibrary/showPicture.php?personid=16329&width=130 http://www.c-spanvideo.org/person/16329 136 548 Head shot of {$person->name} The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [FCC vs. FOX Television]. The case examines the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) tougher enforcement protocol announced in 2004 in reaction to separate instances of foul language and nudity on both FOX and ABC television networks. The Court will decide if the FCC has the constitutional right to enforce rules prohibiting indecent language and nudity on broadcast television and radio. Both the attorneys and judges use language during this oral argument that some may find offensive. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303631-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303631-1 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:16:06 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on [Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington]. The involves the privacy rights and the strip search policies of jails. Albert Florence was wrongfully arrested in 2005 for an unpaid fine and taken to two different jails and strip searched at each one and released six days later after all charges were dropped. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/302034-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/302034-1 Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:28:42 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [General Dynamics v. United States], a case on the "state secrets" doctrine. The doctrine prevents the disclosure in litigation of state secrets. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/297581-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/297581-1 Sun, 23 Jan 2011 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting], involving an Arizona immigration law that imposes sanctions on businesses for hiring illegal immigrants and requires the verification of prospective employees' immigration status against a federal database. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296991-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296991-1 Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:57:48 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral argument in [Schwarzenegger v. Plata], a case centering on prison health care and overcrowding. The appeal centered on a ruling by a three-judge panel at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to release 36,000 to 45,000 California inmates to remedy constitutional deficiencies in the health care provided to prisoners. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296849-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296849-1 Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:27:48 GMT Carter Phillips and Patrick Trueman spoke separately about the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision vacating the Federal Communications Commission's indecency policy. The Court reviewed the policy after it was remanded by the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. Phillips argued the case for Fox Television Stations. Mr. Trueman (and others) filed an amicus brief for Focus on the Family and Family Research Council. Kim Hart was the guest interviewer. The Communicators" is C-SPAN's weekly series that examines the people and events currently shaping telecommunications policy. There is minor audio interference at one point during Mr. Trueman's interview. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/294577-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Interview http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/294577-1 Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:30:42 GMT The Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City heard oral argument in Fox Television v. FCC. The Court will decide if the Federal Communications Commission's policy on the broadcast of curse words (also called "fleeting expletives") during live programs violates the First Amendment. This is the second time the Second Circuit Court heard this case. Both the attorneys and judges use language during this oral argument that some may find offensive. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/291305-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/291305-1 Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:00:59 GMT Legal scholars spoke about the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court term and the possible impact that Justice Sotomayor would have on the court. Following their remarks they answered questions from the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/289266-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/289266-2 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:04:53 GMT A panel of former solicitors general spoke about the range of cases that come before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, including international trade, government contracts, patents, trademarks, certain money claims against the United States, federal personnel, and veterans' benefits. Carter Phillips moderated. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/284703-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/284703-2 Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:06:13 GMT Carter Phillips, the attorney representing Fox Television, spoke to the press after the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of [FCC v. Fox Television.] At issue is the Federal Communications Commission's policy of fining broadcasters for isolated television broadcasts of curse words, called "fleeting expletives," even during live programs. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/282240-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) News Conference http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/282240-1 Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:39:49 GMT America and the Courts previews the case of [FCC v. Fox Television], scheduled to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on November 4, 2008. The Supreme Court would hear oral argument on the Federal Communications Commission's policy of fining broadcasters for isolated television broadcasts of curse words, called "fleeting expletives." The FCC asked the Court to review the case after a lower court invalidated the policy. It would be the first time in 30 years for the Supreme Court to hear a broadcast indecency case. The case stems from two separate broadcasts of the Billboard Music Awards on Fox Television stations. Cher used profanity during the 2002 broadcast and Nicole Richie used profanity in 2003. Video clips of those incidents were shown. Also shown were video clips from the Second Circuit Oral Argument in the [Fox Television v. FCC] case on December 20, 2006, in New York City. Ted Hearn was interviewed about the case. He reacted to an interview with Carter Phillips, attorney for Fox Television, which was taped at the Sidley Austin Law Office in Washington, D.C., on October 20, 2008. Robert Peters and Robin Bronk participated by telephone. This program contains language that some viewers may find offensive. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/282041-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Interview http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/282041-1 Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:11:08 GMT Carter Phillips talked about the [Fox Television v. FCC] case about the Federal Communications Commission's enforcement of its indecency regulations. He is the lead attorney for Fox Television. Mr. Phillips was innterviewed in his law offices at Sidley Austin in Washington, D.C. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/281873-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Interview http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/281873-1 Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 GMT This program contains language that some may find offensive. The guests talked about the decision announced during the week by the U.S. Supreme Court to review a case initially brought by Federal Communications Commission against Fox Television regarding the use of "fleeting expletives". Topics included the history of the case, the significance of it being considered by the high court, FCC policy toward "indecent" speech, and what a review by the Court could mean for broadcasters. Video clips were shown from the oral argument of [Fox Television v. FCC] before the U.S. Court of Appeals Second Circuit in New York City on December 20, 2006. Carter Phillips is an attorney for Fox Television. Robert Sparks filed a legal brief in the case for Parents Television Council. "The Communicators" is C-SPAN's weekly series that examines the people and events that shape telecommunications policy. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/204488-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Interview http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/204488-1 Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:29:11 GMT Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and his former colleague in the Solicitor General's office, attorney Carter Phillips, talked about Supreme Court advocacy and deliberation. The conversation covered both sides of the bench with Justice Alito discussing what expectations he has of the arguments before him, and Carter Phillips talking about his strategy when presenting case to the Court. Mr. Phillips has argued 54 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. Pepperdine University School of Law Dean Starr and Consitutional Law Professor Kmiec facilitated the conversation. Opening remarks by Ken Starr included reflections on William French Smith, the 74th attorney general. Pepperdine University School of Law's inaugural William French Smith Memorial Lecture on Law and the Judiciary was held in the Caruso Auditorium in Malibu. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200323-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200323-1 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:04:10 GMT Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of [Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission]. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively. Language used may offend some viewers. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195903-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195903-1 Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:16:02 GMT Moderated by Mr. Phillips, all the Federal Circuit Court judges discussed their docket work loads, rules and decision-making processes, critical cases on the docket, the use of computers and the Internet, a mediation pilot program, video conferencing and videotaping of oral arguments, and expanding federal courts to handle immigration cases. The Judicial Conference was held at the Grand Hyatt Hotel. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/192618-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/192618-2 Tue, 23 May 2006 07:08:09 GMT A panel of legal experts testified about the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court. Among the topics they addressed were his qualifications for office, past experience as a government lawyer and judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals, his judicial philosophy, past positions on various issues, and his political ideology. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190504-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Senate Committee http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190504-4 Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:19:21 GMT Carter Phillips was interviewed about the life and career of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito, Jr. Mr. Phillips was a colleague of the nominee in the solicitor general's office and talked about their work together and the qualifications of Judge Alito. He also discussed their friendship and their mutual love of baseball. Mr. Phillips is the managing partner of the Washington, D.C. law offices of Sidley Austin Brown and Wood, where the interview took place. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190457-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Interview http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190457-1 Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:50:29 GMT The panelists discussed some of the upcoming cases to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court, including [Oregon v. Ashcroft], which will deal with assisted suicide and [Walker v. Cheney], which will deal with executive privilege. Following their discussion they answered questions from members of the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/172782-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/172782-3 Sat, 05 Oct 2002 22:58:34 GMT Mr. Lacovara and Mr. Cutler argued a hypothetical case in which the Federal Election Commission wishes to reverse the 1975 Supreme Court campaign spending case, [Buckley v. Valeo]. In 1975, the justices ruled that Congress cannot limit campaign spending by candidates. Mr. Webster portrayed the chief justice, while the others portrayed the associate justices. After deliberation, the moot court struck down 1996 campaign finance legislation. Ms. Totenberg moderated the event. The Brennan Center awards were presented to Mr. Lacovara, Mr. Cutler and Mr. Forsky by Mr. Brennan. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/80355-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/80355-1 Wed, 16 Apr 1997 06:09:00 GMT Mr. Carter, who is representing Rep. Thornton, talked about the history and issues of the case, [U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton] which concerns term limits. In 1992, Arkansas voters passed a ballot entry referendum which limits congresspersons to 3 House terms and 2 Senate terms. After these limits the incumbent's name could no longer be printed on the ballot, but could still be a write in vote. The case will be argued before the Court on November 29th. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/61789-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Interview http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/61789-1 Sun, 27 Nov 1994 00:32:00 GMT The participants discussed the impact of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the cases during her first term. The majority of the issues dealt with the First Amendment. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/54724-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/54724-1 Mon, 21 Feb 1994 15:10:00 GMT The National Chamber Litigation Center briefed reporters on the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court term. The center is the public policy law firm of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. It represents business interests in the courts and before regulatory agencies. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/14262-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) News Conference http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/14262-1 Mon, 01 Oct 1990 02:55:00 GMT