http://www.c-spanvideo.org/person/1007474 Paul Clement's recent appearances from the C-SPAN networks en-US Copyright 2013, National Cable Satellite Corporation info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Sun, 19 May 2013 08:31:39 GMT C-SPAN Person Recent Appearances http://www.c-spanvideo.org/videoLibrary/showPicture.php?personid=1007474&width=130 http://www.c-spanvideo.org/person/1007474 136 488 Head shot of {$person->name} The Supreme Court heard oral argument in [United States v. Windsor], the challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). At issue was whether the Court had jurisdiction to rule on the federal government's case, and whether the House Republican leaders as defenders of DOMA had Article III "standing" to pursue their appeal. After arguments on jurisdiction, issues of the constitutionality of section III of DOMA were addressed. Lawyers argued over the requirement in the law that limited the definition of marriage to a union between a man and woman, thus denying federal spousal rights to same-sex marriages conferred on couples in states where the practice had been made legal. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311686-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311686-1 Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:04:15 GMT Panelists talked about the Supreme Court cases that challenged the legality of the Affordable Care Act, the health care law. The last four minutes of the event were cut off for live programming. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308172-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308172-1 Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:26:34 GMT Former Solicitor General Paul Clement spoke about his experience arguing the cases over the Affordable Care Act, the health care reform law. He presented a step by step process of the case as it moved up from the lower courts to the Supreme Court and an in-depth look at the case as it was argued before the Court. He also responded to questions from the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-6 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-6 Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:03:03 GMT Arizona Governor Jan Brewer and lead attorney Paul Clement spoke with reporters following Supreme Court oral arguments on the Arizona immigration law. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305655-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) News Conference http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305655-1 Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:26:33 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the fourth of the four cases challenging the 2010 health care law. The fourth case, [Florida v. Department of Health and Human Services], focused on whether the law's proposed Medicaid expansion violates the federal-state partnership. The Court heard a total of 6 hours of argument over March 26, 27, and 28, 2012. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305134-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305134-2 Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:39:28 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the third of the four cases challenging the 2010 health care law. The focus of the third case, [National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius], was severability; whether the remainder of the health care law could stand if the individual mandate provision is found unconstitutional. This argument was unusual in that the Court debated the consequences of a decision that it had not yet made. The Court heard a total of 6 hours of argument over March 26, 27, and 28, 2012. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305134-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305134-1 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:02:00 GMT Attorneys and others reacted to arguments on the third day of the Supreme Court's consideration of the 2010 health care law. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305174-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) News Conference http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305174-1 Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:06:10 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the second of the four cases challenging the 2010 health care law law. The case, [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida], focused on the constitutionality of the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act which required that citizens purchase health care coverage by 2014 or face a financial penalty. The Court heard a total of 6 hours of argument over March 26, 27, and 28, 2012. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305077-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305077-1 Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:25:08 GMT Panelists previewed Supreme Court oral arguments on the constitutionality of the 2010 health care law, focusing on its requirement that all Americans buy health insurance. Michael Carvin and Paul Clement asserted that the law does not have any limiting principles, reasoning that if Congress has the power to force citizens to buy health insurance, then, Congress can force them to buy anything, such as cars or certain foods. Akhil Amar and Neal Katyal disagreed, with Mr. Katyal arguing that health care differs because everyone will have to use health care services at some point in their lives. Following their discussion,, they answered questions from the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/304464-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/304464-1 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:39:18 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on [Perry v. Perez], a case involving new districts created by the Texas legislature for the state house and senate, and the U.S. House of Representatives. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303582-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303582-1 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:46:36 GMT Historians Bernadette Meyler and David Pietrusza and former Solicitor General Paul Clement talked about the life and career of 1916 Republican presidential nominee Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948) and responded to telephone calls and electronic communications from in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. Hughes served two Supreme Court terms, the second as chief justice, and was a two-term governor and the secretary of state. Video clips included Mr. Patryk showing artifacts in Mr. Hughes' former New York City law offices, Mr. Hughes speaking on December 31, 1940, and swearing in President Roosevelt, and Chief Justice Roberts discussing his legacy. Newsreels from 1937 showed the justices and a fireside chat from President Roosevelt about packing the Supreme Court. "The Contenders: They Lost the Election But Changed Political History" is a C-SPAN series of live programs about 14 presidential candidates before 1996 who lost the election but who had a lasting effect on U.S. politics. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/301272-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) C-SPAN Specials http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/301272-1 Sat, 08 Oct 2011 00:00:06 GMT A three-judge panel at the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta heard oral argument in [Florida v. the Department of Health and Human Services]. The case challenged the 2010 health care law and was brought by 26 states that had banded together in opposition to the law's requirement that everyone have health insurance. The states' argument was that Congress had exceeded its authority and was infringing on the 10th Amendment. A lower district court judge agreed with the argument and voided the entire health care law after ruling that individual insurance mandates were unconstitutional. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/299904-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/299904-1 Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:51:18 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case [Bond v. United States]. The issue in the case was whether a defendant may challenge the constitutionality of a federal criminal statute on 10th Amendment grounds, with plaintiffs arguing that Congress exceeded its constitutional powers in attempting to regulate something the Constitution leaves to the states. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/298145-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/298145-1 Sat, 26 Feb 2011 23:59:12 GMT Former U.S. Solicitor Generals Paul Clement and Gregory Garre, Sri Srinivasan, and a former clerk of Justice Stevens talked about the legacy and personality of John Paul Stevens as a judge. During this discussion, the panelists described working for Justice Stevens and his character traits. Among their remarks he was described as a great questioner as well as a very good listener and a justice of "common law." They also responded to audience members' questions. This program was part of a Georgetown University symposium honoring the life and career of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/295896-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/295896-2 Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:03:54 GMT Mr. Cannon details the story of William Lerach, a corporate crime attorney who sued countless members of the Fortune 500 list, before engaging in criminal behavior himself for which he was ultimately imprisoned and disbarred. Mr. Cannon discussed Lerach's story with former Solicitor General Paul Clement. Mr. Cannon co-wrote Circle of Greed with the executive editor of [California] magazine, Patrick Dillon. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/294645-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Interview http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/294645-1 Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:05:42 GMT Solicitor General Elena Kagan moderated a review of the 2009-2010 term of the U.S. Supreme Court. Among the topics addressed were the role of Justice Kennedy in forming majorities, Justice Stevens pending departure, and several of the cases heard during the term including [Citizen's United v. Federal Election Commission]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/293337-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/293337-1 Sat, 15 May 2010 23:05:37 GMT A panel of former U.S. solicitors general discussed the role of the solicitor general, the duties associated with the job, and arguing before the Supreme Court. The moderator was former Deputy Solicitor General Kenneth Geller. Justice Anthony Kennedy made opening remarks. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/290512-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/290512-1 Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:34:31 GMT Legal scholars spoke about the future of the Supreme Court and potential issues for the court in 2020. Among teh topics they addressed were business and economic law, federalism, and social issues such as race and same-sex marriage. They answered questions from the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/289266-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/289266-3 Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:14:11 GMT Lawyers and scholars participated in a Moot court session to argue the case Graham v. Florida. The case focused on sentencing juveniles to life in prison without parole for crimes other than murder. This portion consists of the moot court decision and discussion. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/289266-101 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/289266-101 Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT A panel of former solicitors general spoke about the range of cases that come before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, including international trade, government contracts, patents, trademarks, certain money claims against the United States, federal personnel, and veterans' benefits. Carter Phillips moderated. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/284703-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/284703-2 Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:06:13 GMT A panel discussion was held about how the philosophy of federalism has been expressed by the U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice Roberts. Judge Sentelle moderated. "Federalism: The Roberts Court and Federalism" was a program at the Federalist Society's 2008 National Lawyers Convention. Held at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C., the convention had a theme of "The People and the Judiciary." http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/282525-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/282525-4 Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:24:14 GMT Paul Clement talked about the role of the solicitor general's office, his experiences as solicitor general, the appellate process, and cases brought to the federal courts over the past several years. Chief Justice John Roberts, the circuit justice for the Federal District, made introductory remarks. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/205393-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/205393-1 Sat, 24 May 2008 23:01:02 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of [District of Columbia v. Heller], in which a 1976 law was challenged that had the effect of banning handguns in the District of Columbia. The Court will decide the central meaning of the Second Amendment's "right of the people to keep and bear arms," and whether it is an individual right or a right in relation to service in a state militia. Walter Dellinger is a former solicitor general. This program contained the audio recording released by the court immediately after the arguments were presented. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Justice Thomas did not speak. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/204466-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/204466-1 Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:22:05 GMT The panelists discussed the ways the U.S. Constitution restrains states from enacting global warming legislation and the future of the federal-state relationship in addressing climate change. Dan Farber is director of the Environmental Law Program at the University of California, Berkeley. "Constitutional Constraints upon State Action" was the third panel of the Conference on Federalism and Climate Change. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/204076-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/204076-1 Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:02:00 GMT The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the cases of [Crawford v. Marion County Election Board] and [Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita] about the validity of the law passed in 2005 by the Indiana Legislature requiring all voters who cast a ballot in person to present photographic identification issued by the United States or State of Indiana. This program contained audio with still images of participants as they spoke. Justice Thomas did not speak. On April 28, 2008, the court issued a 6-3 decision that states may require voters to present photo identification before casting ballots. The Court concluded that the photographic ID requirement was a legitimate interest in preventing voter fraud. Justice Stevens wrote the main opinion for the Court. His opinion was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy. Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito issued concurring opinions. Justices Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer dissented. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/283122-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/283122-1 Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:55:32 GMT Justices heard oral arguments in the cases of [Boumediene v. Bush] and [Al Odah v. U.S.] involving the rights of suspected terrorists held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the detainee's right to challenge their detention through a writ of [habeas corpus]. Attorneys for the government and 37 Guantanamo inmates focused on whether Congress had wrongly denied prisoners judicial review of their detention, or if Congress had created an adequate alternative for prisoners to contest their detention, and whether the Constitution protected the rights of foreigners held outside the country. Photographs of the participants were shown on the screen as each person spoke. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/202767-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/202767-1 Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:42:44 GMT At a farewell ceremony for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Justice Department employees and others praised his career and accomplishments and reminisced about working with him. The Attorney General spoke to the audience, bidding farewell and thanking his employees. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200905-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200905-1 Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:53:33 GMT Paul Clement talked to high school students about the duties of the office of Solicitor General. He also responded to questions from the students about his duties. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/197172-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/197172-2 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:52:12 GMT The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case [Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education]. Plaintiff, Crystal Meredith, son's Louisville, Kentucky, school district required most schools to maintain a black enrollment of 15 percent to 50 percent. The Court would decide the role race could play when assigning students to K-12 schools in an effort to achieve diversity. This program contained audio released by the court immediately after the arguments were presented with still images of participants as they spoke. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195615-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195615-2 Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:24:46 GMT The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of [Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1]. The Seattle School Board adopted a plan to assign students to schools on the basis of race in an effort to overcome the effects of segregated housing patterns. Parents of children who were not assigned to the school they chose sued, questioning the validity of the desegregation plan. Court will decide what role race can be used when assigning students to K-12 schools in an effort to achieve diversity. This program contained audio released by the court immediately after the arguments were presented with still images of participants as they spoke. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195615-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195615-1 Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:07:19 GMT Justices heard oral arguments on two cases involving partial birth abortions. At 10 a.m. the justices heard arguments in [Gonzales v. Carhart, et al.]. At 11 a.m., they heard [Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, et al.] The Court will decide the constitutionality of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. It prohibits a doctor from knowingly performing a partial-birth abortion. The act contains an exception for cases in which an abortion is necessary to preserve the life of the mother, but no exception for the health of the mother. Congress made factual findings before passing the act, including that a partial-birth abortion is never medically necessary to preserve the health of the mother. Priscilla Smith argued for physicians, including Leroy Carhart. Eve Gartner and Therese Stewart argued for Planned Parenthood. The U.S. Supreme Court does not permit cameras in its proceedings. This video features audio with still picture images of the participants. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195290-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195290-1 Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:59:27 GMT A memorial service was held for Chief Justice William Rehnquist in the Upper Great Hall of the U.S. Supreme Court. He served as an associate justice from 1971 to 1986 and as chief justice from 1986 to 2005. His life and career were praised by speakers, including the U.S. Solicitor General, his son, and a number of his former staff members and clerks. William Rehnquist died in September 2005 from cancer. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/193011-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/193011-1 Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:10:11 GMT Mr. Clement talked about his life and his career that culminated in becoming U.S. Solicitor General in 2005. Topics included debating skills, arguing cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, and the issue of cameras in the courtroom, Solicitor General Clement was interviewed at his office in the Justice Department. He was nominated by President George W. Bush on March 14, 2005, confirmed by the U.S. Senate on June 8, and took the oath of office on June 13, 2005. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/192463-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) American Profile http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/192463-1 Sat, 20 May 2006 14:03:17 GMT Mr. Clement delivered the William V. O'Brien Lecture in International Law and Morality in the Leavey Center Ballroom at Georgetown University. He talked about what can be learned from international law as domestic law lawyers. He also responded to questions from members of the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191943-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191943-1 Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:06:46 GMT Government and plaintiff attorneys presented oral arguments in [Hamdan v. Rumsfeld] on the constitutionality of using military commissions to try al-Qaida members accused of war crimes. Among the issues addressed were precedents for using military commissions and tribunals, whether a state of war existed under which war crimes could be tried, and [habeas corpus]. Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Yemen native, served as the driver and aide to Osama Bin Laden until he was captured in Afghanistan and subsequently detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. He filed a petition of [habeas corpus] to challenge his confinement. In July 2005 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled against Hamdan, saying Congress had authorized the president to set up special tribunals. The court also ruled that detainees could not appeal based on violations of international treaties, such as the Geneva Conventions. Chief Justice Roberts recused himself from this case. He heard the case while on the D.C. Court of Appeals. This program contained audio released by the court immediately after the arguments were presented with still images of participants as they spoke. On Thursday, June 29, 2006, the Court ruled that Congress did not take away the Court's authority to rule on the validity of military commissions. It also held that President Bush did not have the authority to set up the tribunals at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and that military commissions are illegal under both military justice law and the Geneva Convention. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191770-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191770-1 Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:47:43 GMT Solicitor General of the United States Paul Clement and Former Solicitor General of the United States Seth Waxman discuss recent Supreme Court cases. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191543-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191543-2 Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:00:00 GMT At a conference on "The Legacy of the Rehnquist Court," a panel of solicitors general discussed the impact of the Rehnquest Court, the structural Constitution under the Rehnquist Court, and issues of separation of powers and federalism. Each panelist reminisced in detail about his experiences in the Rehnquist Court. The discussion was moderated by Dean Kearney. The event was held at the Pfister Hotel. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191349-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191349-1 Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:02:32 GMT Following some court business including the release of an opinion by Justice Thomas and admissions to the Supreme Court Bar, attorneys made oral arguments in the case of [Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights]. The case revolved around the constitutionality of the Solomon Amendment, a federal law that requires universities to allow military recruitment on campus or lose federal funds. Solicitor General Paul Clement argued for the Department of Defense. Joshua Rosenkranz argued for the Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights. A New Jersey federal court rejected FAIR's argument that the Solomon Amendment violated the First Amendment. FAIR contended that universities should not have to allow military recruitment on campus because of the exclusion of homosexuals from the military violated their non-discrimination policies. On appeal, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court and ruled that the law violated the First Amendment by conditioning federal funds on allowing military recruiters on campus. Congress originally passed the Solomon Amendment in 1994. The Department of Defense interpreted the amendment as merely requiring schools to give recruiters access to the campus, but not requiring schools to affirmatively assist the recruiters. After September 11, 2001, the Department of Defense (DoD) indicated that it interpreted the amendment to require schools to treat military recruiters in the same way that they treat all other employment recruiters. In 2004, Congress amended the Solomon Amendment to reflect the DoD policy. This program contained audio released by the court immediately after the arguments were presented with still images of participants as they spoke. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190181-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190181-1 Tue, 06 Dec 2005 16:15:48 GMT Attorneys made oral arguments in the case of [Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England]. Justices questioned litigants as they mad arguments about the scope of New Hampshire legislation in question, the nature of emergency and critical decisions by attending physicians, and precedents involving prior abortion decisions. In June of 2003 the New Hampshire Legislature passed the [New Hampshire Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act] requiring that the doctor notify the parent of a minor at least 48 hours before performing an abortion. Without parental notification, the doctor can be sued by the minor's parents and face possible criminal charges. A New Hampshire District court ruled that the act was unconstitutional using previous standards set by the Supreme Court in [Planned Parenthood of Southeast Pennsylvania v. Casey] and [Stenberg v. Carhart], which provides that laws may not impose an undue burden on the right to choose abortion. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's ruling. This program contained audio released by the court immediately after the arguments were presented with still images of participants as they spoke. Justice Thomas was present but did not ask any questions. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190101-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190101-1 Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:05:32 GMT Justice Ginsburg talked about the Rehnquist Court and her personal experiences with the Chief Justice. She introduced a panel of former solicitors general who talk about the Rehnquist Court legacy. The panelists discussed the legacy of the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist, their views on the current judicial confirmation process, and significant cases. Following their discussion, the participants responded to questions and comments from members of the audience. Current Solicitor General Clement moderated the panel. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/189596-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/189596-1 Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:41:13 GMT Moderated by Mr. Mauro, legal experts discussed the 2004-2005 U.S. Supreme Court term. Attorneys who argued cases before the Supreme Court during this term talked about their strategies and experiences. Other topics included Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's resignation and the outlook for the 2005-2006 term. After their presentations the participants answered audience members' questions. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/187498-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/187498-1 Thu, 07 Jul 2005 00:25:16 GMT The Senate Judiciary Committee held a confirmation hearing for Acting Solicitor General Paul Clement to be Solicitor General. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/186490-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Senate Committee http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/186490-1 Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:22:54 GMT Mr. Clement spoke about a number of issues of international law. He talked about his experiences learning about international law, and asserted that this area is often overlooked in law schools. He talked about changing attitudes on international law and the U.S. Supreme Court. He noted that many commentators have asserted that the Court has become more "globalized or internationalized." Mr. Clement, however, asserted that the Supreme Court "remains focused on the domestic law of the U.S." Following his remarks he responded to audience questions. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/183908-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/183908-1 Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:15:56 GMT Acting U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement discussed the October 2003 Supreme Court term and the coming term, which begins on Monday, October 4, 2004. Mr. Clement, a native of Milwaukee, was Principle Deputy Solicitor General under Theodore Olson, who resigned last spring to return to private practice. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/183547-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/183547-1 Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:59:58 GMT Attorneys presented oral arguments in the case of [Hamdi v. Rumsfeld] which focused on the detention of American citizens captured in hostilities overseas and classified an enemy combatant. At issue were the [habeas corpus] provisions of the Constitution and a citizen's rights to a hearing upon detention. Mr. Hamdi had been taken into U.S. custody as an enemy combatant in Afghanistan in 2001 and was being held in a military facility in the U.S. This program contained audio released by the Supreme Court immediately after the arguments were presented to the court with still images of participants as they spoke. Justice Thomas was present but did not ask any questions. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/181561-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/181561-1 Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:20:15 GMT Attorneys made oral arguments in the case of [Rumsfeld v. Padilla] which focused on writs of [habeas corpus] for citizens deemed enemy combatants who were arrested on U.S. soil and detained without access to the legal system. This program contained audio released by the court immediately after the arguments were presented with still images of participants as they spoke. Justice Thomas was present but did not ask any questions. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/181561-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/181561-2 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 GMT An audio record of oral arguments from earlier in the day in a case over campaign finance reform legislation were played over still images of the participants. Arguments focused on limits to unregulated, or "soft money," campaign contributions, new restrictions on some forms of campaign advertising, and campaign contributions by minors. This hearing took place in an unusual session prior to the normal Supreme Court term and lasted four hours. It also was only the third time audio of a hearing had been released on the day of the oral arguments. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/178062-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Public Affairs Event http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/178062-1 Mon, 08 Sep 2003 19:45:22 GMT