The most popular programs for the Supreme Court Cases - 1995 Tag http://www.c-spanvideo.org/browse?topic=773 en-US Copyright 2013, National Cable Satellite Corporation info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Sat, 29 Jun 1996 00:00:00 GMT Fri, 24 May 2013 00:07:08 GMT A panel of legal scholars analyzed the major decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court's 1995 term, including the Virginia Military Institute case. They talked about cases concerning federalism, political participation, voting rights, the First Amendment, criminal justice, and interpretive issues. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/73197-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/73197-1 Sat, 29 Jun 1996 00:00:00 GMT In 1988, John Bennis transported a prostitute a short distance on his way home from work. The county charged him with gross indecency and sued for forfeiture of his automobile. Mrs. Tina Bennis later sued the county for the amount of money she had invested in the automobile since she had no knowledge of her husband's illegal activities. She appealed the county and state decisions to the Supreme Court. Mrs. Bennis' attorney and others discussed the facts of and issues involved in this case, including due process and seizure issues. The Court will hear arguments in the case on 29 November. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/68492-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/68492-1 Sat, 29 Jun 1996 00:00:00 GMT Current news events and political issues were examined through reviews of the morning newspapers; interviews with journalists, newsmakers and legislators; and viewer telephone calls, faxes and electronic mail. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/68046-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/68046-1 Sat, 29 Jun 1996 00:00:00 GMT In an interview, Ms. Riche described the process and costs of the dicennial census. Its purpose under the U.S. Constitution is for apportioning congressional districts. Mr. Goldin described [Wisconsin v. New York City], a redistricting case which was argued on January 10 before the U.S. Supreme Court. New York City maintains that the large undercount of minorities deprived the city of federal funds and congressional representation. Several cities sued the Commerce Secretary for refusing to make statistical adjustments to 1990 Census figures. Mr. Doyle argued [Wisconsin v. New York City] before the Court. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/69343-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/69343-1 Sat, 29 Jun 1996 00:00:00 GMT