The most popular programs for the Supreme Court Cases - 2011 Tag http://www.c-spanvideo.org/browse?topic=5463 en-US Copyright 2013, National Cable Satellite Corporation info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:03:28 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the first of the four cases challenging the 2010 health care law. [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida] examined the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA), a law that prohibited courts from striking down tax laws before they take effect. Attorney Robert Long was appointed by the Court to argue that the AIA applied in this case, as none of the parties to the case was arguing that the AIA barred the Court from reviewing the challenges. The Court heard a total of 6 hours of argument over March 26, 27, and 28, 2012. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305055-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305055-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the second of the four cases challenging the 2010 health care law law. The case, [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida], focused on the constitutionality of the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act which required that citizens purchase health care coverage by 2014 or face a financial penalty. The Court heard a total of 6 hours of argument over March 26, 27, and 28, 2012. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305077-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305077-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Henry Waxman (D-CA), a key player in passing the Affordable Health Care Act, talked about the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the law. Other topics included Republican leaders' pledge to repeal the law, the Keystone XL Pipeline, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) budget, and Republican efforts to block the EPA from making new rules about greenhouse gas emissions. Following his remarks journalist commented on the interview. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306839-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306839-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the third of the four cases challenging the 2010 health care law. The focus of the third case, [National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius], was severability; whether the remainder of the health care law could stand if the individual mandate provision is found unconstitutional. This argument was unusual in that the Court debated the consequences of a decision that it had not yet made. The Court heard a total of 6 hours of argument over March 26, 27, and 28, 2012. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305134-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305134-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the fourth of the four cases challenging the 2010 health care law. The fourth case, [Florida v. Department of Health and Human Services], focused on whether the law's proposed Medicaid expansion violates the federal-state partnership. The Court heard a total of 6 hours of argument over March 26, 27, and 28, 2012. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305134-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305134-2 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Panelists previewed Supreme Court oral arguments on the constitutionality of the 2010 health care law, focusing on its requirement that all Americans buy health insurance. Michael Carvin and Paul Clement asserted that the law does not have any limiting principles, reasoning that if Congress has the power to force citizens to buy health insurance, then, Congress can force them to buy anything, such as cars or certain foods. Akhil Amar and Neal Katyal disagreed, with Mr. Katyal arguing that health care differs because everyone will have to use health care services at some point in their lives. Following their discussion,, they answered questions from the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/304464-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/304464-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Current and former Arizona state officials testified on the constitutionality of their state's immigration law and its impact on the state's Latino community. Following the end of the hearing, one of the witnesses, Russell Pearce, who was one of the chief author's of the law, spoke with reporters. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305622-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305622-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT President Obama reacted to the Supreme Court decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act, the health care law. He called the decision a "victory" for the American people and outlined ways in which the law would benefit citizens. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306816-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306816-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [Arizona v. U.S.]. The case involves the issue of whether the federal government or states have the right to enforce immigration law. Arizona's law includes provisions requiring police to check the immigration status of anyone detained or suspected of being in the country illegally. Immigrants must carry their papers at all times. Illegal immigrants are banned from soliciting for work in public places and police can arrest immigrants without a warrant if an officer believes they have committed a crime that would make them deportable. Justice Elena Kagan recused herself from the Supreme Court oral argument as she was President Obama's solicitor general when the federal government filed the lawsuit against Arizona. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305611-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305611-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Law Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Stephen Presser talked about the constitutionality of the individual mandate provision of the 2010 health care law which required that citizens purchase health care coverage by 2014 or face a financial penalty. They responded to telephone calls and electronic communications from viewers. Protesters for and against the law were interviewed outside the Court building. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305079-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305079-3 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Amy Schatz talked about Supreme Court case on the Federal Communications Commission's rules on foul language and nudity on broadcast television and radio. The court is being asked to decide if the FCC has constitutional authority to enforce rules on what some would deem as indecent content on broadcast television and radio. She also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303660-6 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303660-6 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Attorneys Andrew Pincus and Ilya Somin previewed the Supreme Court oral argument on the constitutionality of the 2010 health care law. They outlined the legal principles the Court will examine during each day of the three days of argument. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/304888-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/304888-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Rick Santorum spoke to reporters following the first of the three days the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the 2010 health care law. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305117-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305117-3 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Panelists previewed the Supreme Court oral arguments on the constitutionality of the 2010 health care law requirement that people purchase health care coverage by 2014 or face a financial penalty. Michael Cannon and Randy Barnett reasoned that the mandate is unconstitutional, with Mr. Barnett calling it "unprecedented," "uncabined," "unnecessary," and "dangerous." Elizabeth Wydra argued that the requirement is constitutional on the grounds of the interstate commerce and necessary and proper clauses. Afterward, they answered questions from the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305060-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305060-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Activists in favor of and opposed to the health care law spoke outside the Supreme Court following the first day of oral arguments. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305117-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305117-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Legal experts previewed the 2012-13 Supreme Court term. Some of the cases included affirmative action at universities, human rights abuses overseas, national security, and privacy issues, among others. Participants responded to questions from the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308423-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308423-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Two of the plaintiffs in the four Supreme Court cases challenging the 2010 health care law talked about the Court's ruling in favor of the statute. They focused on the legal aspects. Afterward, they answered questions from audience members. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306843-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306843-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Daniel Stein and Alo Noorani previewed and debated upcoming Supreme Court oral arguments over Arizona's immigration law, and they responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. The lawh gives state police the power to ask about the immigration status of anyone they stop and detain those suspected of being in the country illegally. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305632-5 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305632-5 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Legal experts talked about the Supreme Court's ruling that upheld the Affordable Care Act, the health care law. The three panelists, all of whom oppose the legislation, discussed the role of government in health care, constitutional issues, tax issues, and the 2012 elections. They responded to questions from the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306875-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306875-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Ilya Somin talked about the the individual mandate of the 2010 health care law that requires all Americans to either buy individual insurance policies or pay fines. The Supreme Court was scheduled to hear oral arguments on the subject the following week. He responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. Reverend Paul Schenck was interviewed outside the Supreme Court about his views on the health care law. He supports universal health care but opposes the requirement that insurance companies cover contraception. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305078-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305078-3 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Adams Liptak was interviewed by phone about the Supreme Court's decision to hear a case on affirmative action as a factor in college entry. The case involves a suit brought by a white student denied a spot at the University of Texas. This was the first time the court dealt with the issue of affirmative action in higher education since its 2003 decision endorsing the use of race as a factor in admissions. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/304531-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/304531-3 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on [Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington]. The involves the privacy rights and the strip search policies of jails. Albert Florence was wrongfully arrested in 2005 for an unpaid fine and taken to two different jails and strip searched at each one and released six days later after all charges were dropped. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/302034-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/302034-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [FCC vs. FOX Television]. The case examines the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) tougher enforcement protocol announced in 2004 in reaction to separate instances of foul language and nudity on both FOX and ABC television networks. The Court will decide if the FCC has the constitutional right to enforce rules prohibiting indecent language and nudity on broadcast television and radio. Both the attorneys and judges use language during this oral argument that some may find offensive. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303631-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303631-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [ U.S. v. Alvarez]. The case involves the constitutionality of a federal law that makes lying about receiving military medals or honors a crime. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/304540-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/304540-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC]. The case focused on on whether a teacher at a religious elementary school who teaches the full secular curriculum, but also teaches daily religion classes, can bring employment discrimination suits against the school, if fired. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/301939-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/301939-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT House Republican leaders reacted to the Supreme Court decision that upheld the the health care law, the Affordable Care Act. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306818-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306818-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Emily Ethridge and Jess Bravin reviewed the previous day Supreme Court oral arguments on the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act which required that citizens purchase health care coverage by 2014 or face a financial penalty. They also previewed upcoming arguments on the expansion of Medicaid, and severability, whether the rest of the health care law can stand if the individual mandate provision is found unconstitutional. Wilfred Dunn was interviewed outside the Court building about his interest in day 3 oral arguments on the expansion of Medicaid. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305080-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305080-2 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Legal analysts and experts reviewed the Supreme Court's ruling on the Affordable Care Act, the health care law. They analyzed the various aspects of the cases involved in the decision: Chief Justice Roberts' interpretation of the Commerce Clause and the individual mandate, the expansion of Medicaid, and the Anti-Injunction Act, a law that prohibited courts from striking down tax laws before they take effect. All of the panelists were against the health care law. This forum was part of the Cato Institute's annual publication of its review of the Supreme Court term and it Constitution Day celebration. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Panelists reviewed Supreme Court decisions in the 2011-2012 term. Among the topics they addressed were cases involving health care, an Arizona immigration law, and the Stolen Valor Act. They also talked about Chief Justice John Roberts' role in upholding the Affordable Care Act and how it might define the court in the future. They responded to questions from the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/307003-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/307003-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Panelists previewed the 2012-13 Supreme Court term. Potential cases included a University of Texas affirmative action case and 4th Amendment unreasonable search cases. There are also cases the Supreme Court could take this term on issues such as the Voting Rights Act and same-sex marriage. This forum was part of the Cato Institute's annual publication of its review of the Supreme Court term and it Constitution Day celebration. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-4 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Supreme Court reporters reviewed the 2011-12 term. Among the topics they covered were the consistency of the justices on First Amendment issues, rulings against the government in life sentences for juveniles, allowing police to track someone by global positioning systems, and plea bargaining cases. They discussed the Affordable Care Act ruling, the health care law, at length. Of Chief Justice Roberts' vote on health care, David Savage said, "...eight of the nine voted as you would have guessed.... Only one justice voted in a way that you wouldn't have guessed....It seems to me the last person you ought to say that made a decision that's political is John Roberts." http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306898-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306898-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Mitt Romney reacted to the Supreme Court decision that upheld the the health care law, the Affordable Care Act. He said that if he were elected president in November, he would begin the repeal process on his first day in office. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306825-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306825-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Dahlia Lithwick and Tony Mauro previewed the second day of Supreme Court oral arguments on the 2010 health care law, and they responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. They also reviewed day one oral arguments. Audio clips of some of the exchanges from day one were played. Three students were interviewed outside the Supreme Court building about their interests in the case. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305079-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305079-2 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Constitutional and health law scholars, practitioners and commentators talked about the Supreme Court decision that the Affordable Care Act, the health care law, is constitutional. The court ruled in favor of the statute based on Congress' power to levy taxes. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306850-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306850-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Susan Dentzer and Robert Barnes talked about the legal and policy implications of the Supreme Court's decision on the the health care law, the Affordable Care Act. Telephone lines were open for viewer comments and questions about the ruling. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306845-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306845-2 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Jess Bravin talked about the Supreme Court's ruling in [U.S. v. Arizona], the Arizona immigration law, and he responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. Michel Marizco was interviewed by phone about reaction in Arizona to the decision. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306772-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306772-2 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [Zivotofsky vs. Clinton], a case dealing with executive power and Congress, and whether Jerusalem, Israel, can be listed as a birthplace in a passport. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/302564-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/302564-2 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Democratic Senators Charles Schumer (NY), Tom Harkin (IA) Patrick Leahy (VT), and Jack Reed (RI) spoke to reporters following the second day of oral arguments on the 2010 health care law. The second day focused on the constitutionality of the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act which required that citizens purchase health care coverage by 2014 or face a financial penalty. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305137-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305137-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Senate Democratic leaders reacted to the Supreme Court decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act, the health care law. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306837-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306837-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on [Maples v. Thomas]. The case involves the right of defendants to argue the constitutionality of their death sentence when their lawyer misses a state court filing deadline. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/301938-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/301938-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT 4:20 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. Plenary Session 11 - Pavilion The Supreme Court and Obamacare Mr. Carvin argued the lion s share of Obamacare case in front of the Supreme Court. This is the first time he has spoken in depth to the press on the case. Introduction: Elliot Berke, RNLA Vice President for Programming; Partner, McGuireWoods LLP Speaker: Michael Carvin, Partner, Jones Day http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305572-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305572-2 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT David Savage gave an overview of the arguments the Supreme Court will be hearing on the 2010 health care law, and he answered phone calls and electronic communications from viewers. He previewed the arguments the Court will hear, talked about the significance of the case, historical precedents, the individual mandate in the law, and other topics. Dr. Michael Newman was interviewed outside the Supreme Court building about the reasons he supports the health care law. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305078-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305078-2 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) talked about the Supreme Court decision to uphold the health law, the Affordable Care Act. She also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306845-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306845-3 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Committee members considered a bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act, the health care law. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306957-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/306957-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Scott Pruitt talked about Oklahoma's challenge to the Affordable Care Act (the health care law), focusing on penalties that employers in the state would face if they do no offer affordable health coverage to their workers. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. C-SPAN Radio's Nancy Calo read news headlines at the end of the program. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308390-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308390-4 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on [Perry v. Perez], a case involving new districts created by the Texas legislature for the state house and senate, and the U.S. House of Representatives. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303582-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303582-1 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT David Shapiro talked about the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in favor of allowing strip searches of all prisoners before joining a jail's general population, regardless of why they were arrested. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305312-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305312-4 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Susan Dentzer talked about the Supreme Court's decision to review the 2010 health care law, including the individual mandate, and the expansion of Medicaid. She responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. C-SPAN Radio's Nancy Calo read news headlines at the end of the program. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/302863-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/302863-3 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Former Solicitor General Paul Clement spoke about his experience arguing the cases over the Affordable Care Act, the health care reform law. He presented a step by step process of the case as it moved up from the lower courts to the Supreme Court and an in-depth look at the case as it was argued before the Court. He also responded to questions from the audience. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-6 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308247-6 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT Attorneys and plaintiffs involved in one of the 2010 health care law cases reacted to the second day of Supreme Court oral arguments on the constitutionality of the individual mandate provision. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305137-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/305137-4 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT