The most recent programs for the Supreme Court Cases - 2000 Tag http://www.c-spanvideo.org/browse?topic=805 en-US Copyright 2013, National Cable Satellite Corporation info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Sat, 25 May 2013 10:24:53 GMT Charles Wells talked about the 2000 presidential election when he presided over the [Bush v. Gore]case at the state level before the Supreme Court decided on the race. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. Nancy Calo read the latest headline news from C-SPAN Radio. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309292-5 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309292-5 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT The panelists talked about recent noteworthy U.S. Supreme Court cases that they had covered for their respective media outlets. They all contributed to the book co-edited by Timothy Johnson, [A Good Quarrel: America's Top Legal Reporters Share Stories from Inside the Supreme Court], published by the University of Michigan Press. Each panelist presented the case that he had contributed to the book, which included [Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow] about the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, [Planned Parenthood v. Casey] about abortion rights, [Bush v. Gore] about Florida's recount process, and [Glickman v Wileman Brothers and Elliot, Inc.] about produce growers being forced to pay a federally backed entity that markets their goods. They included audio clips of the oral arguments. Then they discussed topics including the manner, behavior, and questioning of justices, the importance and role of oral argument, and cameras in the courtroom. Paul Wahlbeck moderated. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287035-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287035-2 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Oral Arguments were heard in the U.S. Supreme Court case [Stenberg v. Carhart]. Nebraska Attorney General Donald Stenberg and Simon Heller, who represented Dr. Leroy Carhart, argued whether a Nebraska statute violated the liberty protected by due process of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Nebraska law prohibited any partial birth abortion unless the procedure was necessary to save the mother's life. This program contains audio of the court with still images of participants as they spoke http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/159154-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/159154-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Professors Alvare and Pillard participated in a roundtable discussion to examine the history of the U.S. Supreme Court's abortion decisions. They discussed the effect the first new justices on the bench since 1994 would have on future decisions and the confirmation hearing for appeals court Judge Samuel Alito. The program included audio clips from the oral arguments in four Supreme Court cases with still pictures of the participants: [Roe v. Wade, Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, Planned Parenthood v. Casey], and [Stenberg v. Carhart]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190565-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/190565-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Justice Breyer talked about the state of the legal profession and the importance of public service as a representative of the court. He also talked about pro bono work, privacy and First Amendment rights, and the [Bush vs. Gore] decision. Justice Breyer was among the dissenters in the 5 to 4 decision that stopped Florida ballot recounts sought by former Vice President Al Gore. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/165536-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/165536-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Justices testified about funding priorities of the Supreme Court. They also responded to questions about their decision in the case of [Bush v. Gore], television coverage of court proceedings, and minority representation on the Supreme Court staff. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/163461-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/163461-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Following oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the case of [Bush v. Gore], senators spoke to reporters about their impressions of the arguments. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Following oral arguments in the Supreme Court case of [Bush v. Gore], Mr Jackson spoke to reporters about his impressions of the arguments presented and questions asked. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-4 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Following oral arguments in the Supreme Court case of [Bush v. Gore], Mr. Evans spoke to reporters about his impressions of the arguments and questions in the case. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-6 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-6 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Following oral arguments in the Supreme Court case of [Bush v. Gore], representatives spoke to reporters about their impressions of the arguments. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-3 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Following oral arguments in the Supreme Court case of [Bush v. Gore], Former Senator Dole spoke to reporters about his impressions of the arguments and questions. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-5 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-5 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Justices heard arguments in the case of [Bush v. Gore] regarding the manual recount of "undervote" ballots ordered by the Florida Supreme Court. Among the concerns of the justices were whether the Florida Supreme Court had made new law in their decision, whether the recount standard was too broad, and whether federal statutes had been violated. The arguments and questions were presented in an audio format with still photos and artist renderings of court proceedings. Justice Thomas was present but did not ask any questions of the lawyers. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161185-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161185-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were open for viewer comments and questions about the Supreme Court case of [Bush v. Gore] concerning the Florida presidential election contest. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161206-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161206-4 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were open for viewer comments and questions about oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the case of [Bush v. Gore] concerning the presidential election contest in Florida. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161206-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161206-3 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Following oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the case of [Bush v. Gore], Mr. Olson spoke to reporters about his impressions of the hearing. Following brief remarks he answered questions from reporters. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161208-2 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Following oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the case of [Bush v. Gore], Mr. Bioes spoke to reporters about his impressions of the hearing and expressed hope that the justices would rule in favor of the Gore campaign. Following his brief remarks he answered questions from the reporters. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161202-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161202-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were opened for viewer comments. Live shots were shown of demonstrators outside the U.S. Supreme Court building prior to and during oral arguments in the case of [Bush v. Gore]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161203-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/161203-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Speaker Feeney announced that the Florida House and Senate will attempt to participate in the U.S. Supreme Court case [Bush v. Gore] regarding whether the Florida Supreme Court exceeded its constitutional authority in directing the conduct of members of the executive branch, and for other reasons. He did not answer any media questions. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/160771-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/160771-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Following oral arguments before the Supreme Court, advocates from both sides talked to reporters about the case of [Boy Scouts of America v. Dale]. The case focused on whether the Boy Scouts could assert First Amendment privileges to keep homosexuals from participating in their organization. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/156794-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/156794-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Mr. Eastman and Mr. Adams discussed a case coming before the Supreme Court, [Boy Scouts of America v. Dale]. The case concerns whether or not the Boy Scouts can exclude gay troop members and leaders. They also responded to viewer calls, faxes, and electronic mail. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/156784-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/156784-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT Following oral arguments before the Supreme Court advocates from both sides talked to reporters about the proceedings. The case focused on whether a Nebraska law banning certain types of abortions was too vague and therefore could not be used to bar clearly legal procedures. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/156750-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/156750-1 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT