The most recent programs for the Supreme Court Cases - 2012 Tag http://www.c-spanvideo.org/browse?topic=5542 en-US Copyright 2013, National Cable Satellite Corporation info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Fri, 24 May 2013 21:22:05 GMT Gregory Angelo talked about the recent Supreme Court hearings on same-sex marriage, and changing attitudes among some Republicans on the issue. He responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311838-5 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311838-5 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Robert Barnes reviewed the oral argument earlier in the day in the Supreme Court case [United States v. Windsor], the challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). He also talked about the history of the case that involved Edith Windsor being required to pay more than $300,000 in inheritance taxes following the death of her partner of over 40 years which she would not have been taxed if her spouse was a man. He was interviewed by telephone from the [Washington Post] newsroom. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311795-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311795-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were open for comments on same-sex marriage after an airing of the oral argument in the Supreme Court case [United States v. Windsor], the challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which was argued earlier in the day. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/82354-101 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/82354-101 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were open for comments on same-sex marriage as a distant view of the U.S. Supreme Court building was shown. [Washington Post] Supreme Court reporter Robert Barnes spoke by telephone, reviewing the oral argument earlier in the day in the Supreme Court case [United States v. Windsor], the challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). He also talked about the history of the case that involved Edith Windsor being required to pay more than $300,000 in inheritance taxes following the death of her partner of over 40 years which she would not have been taxed if her spouse was a man. A video clip was shown of Edith Windsor talking to reporters on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court after the oral arguments. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/82354-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/82354-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral argument in [United States v. Windsor], the challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). At issue was whether the Court had jurisdiction to rule on the federal government's case, and whether the House Republican leaders as defenders of DOMA had Article III "standing" to pursue their appeal. After arguments on jurisdiction, issues of the constitutionality of section III of DOMA were addressed. Lawyers argued over the requirement in the law that limited the definition of marriage to a union between a man and woman, thus denying federal spousal rights to same-sex marriages conferred on couples in states where the practice had been made legal. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311686-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311686-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Legal scholars and same-sex marriage advocates talked about Supreme Court oral arguments in two same-sex marriage cases. [Hollingsworth v. Perry] concerned California's Proposition 8 law, which amended the state constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to get married. [United States v. Windsor] challenged the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311780-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311780-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The U.S. Supreme Court was shown in the distance after oral arguments in the same-sex marriage case [United States v. Windsor]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-107 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-107 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) spoke with reporters and answered questions after attending oral argument in the Supreme Court case [United States v. Windsor], which challenged the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). She predicted the outcome of the case and remarked on the issue of same-sex marriage itself. She also talked about the process that led to House Republicans defending DOMA in court when the Justice Department would not. Finally, she commented on developments regarding gun control and immigration bills. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311782-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311782-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Scenes were shown outside the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments in the same-sex marriage case United States v. Windsor. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-102 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-102 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Scenes were shown outside the U.S. Supreme Court after oral arguments in the same-sex marriage case [United States v. Windsor]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-101 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-101 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Edith Windsor, the respondent in [United States v. Windsor], and her attorneys spoke to reporters following Supreme Court oral argument in the case, which challenged the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). After the death in 2009 of her partner of over 40 years, Ms. Windsor was required to pay more than $300,000 in inheritance taxes because DOMA mandates that a spouse, as legally defined, must be a person of the opposite sex. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311793-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311793-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Scenes were shown outside the U.S. Supreme Court waiting for participants to speak after oral arguments in the same-sex marriage case [United States v. Windsor]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-106 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-106 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Following oral argument in the Supreme Court [United States v. Windsor] case, Reverend Rob Schenck spoke to reporters and answered questions on the steps outside the Court. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311793-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311793-2 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The U.S. Supreme Court was shown in the distance during oral arguments in the same-sex marriage case [United States v. Windsor]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-105 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-105 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The U.S. Supreme Court was shown in the distance during oral arguments in the same-sex marriage case [United States v. Windsor]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-104 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-104 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Scenes were shown outside the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments in the same-sex marriage case [United States v. Windsor]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-103 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-103 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Scenes were shown outside the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments in the same-sex marriage case [United States v. Windsor]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311792-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on the topic, "Should the Supreme Court recognize same-sex marriage?" Nancy Calo read news headlines from C-SPAN Radio at the end of the program. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311784-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311784-4 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Joan Biskupic talked about oral argument in the Supreme Court [United States v. Windsor] case to be argued later that day, which challenged the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). She described the history of DOMA and how it came before the Court, and she responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. Live scenes were shown of the crowds outside the U.S. Supreme Court waiting for the oral argument in [United States v. Windsor]. A video clip was shown from the previous day's case [Hollingsworth v. Perry]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311784-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311784-3 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on the topic, "Should the Supreme Court recognize same-sex marriage?" http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311784-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311784-2 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Announcements were made about television coverage of the issues of the two same-sex marriage cases heard by the U.S. Supreme Court earlier that day and the next day. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311660-105 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311660-105 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were open for viewer reactions after hearing the oral arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court the same-sex marriage case [Hollingsworth v. Perry]. Comments were also sought on the case that would be heard the next day and on same-sex marriage in general. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311660-103 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311660-103 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard arguments in [Hollingsworth v. Perry] on the constitutionality of California's proposition 8 law. Nearly 18,000 same-sex couples were married in California, but same-sex marriages came to a halt in November 2008, when the state's voters passed Proposition 8, which amended the state constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to get married. Questions by several justices focused on whether the central purpose of marriage was procreation, and on whether proponents of the ban had legal standing to bring the case after the state of California declined to do so when the referendum result was overturned by a federal court. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311637-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311637-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Scenes were shown outside the U.S. Supreme Court after oral arguments were heard in the same-sex marriage case [Hollingsworth v. Perry]. Another case would be argued the next day. Advocates and opponents of marriage equality gathered on the public thoroughfares outside the Supreme Court. News stories were also read. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311660-101 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311660-101 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Following oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of [Hollingsworth v. Perry], lawyers for the petitioners spoke to reporters and answered questions on the steps of the Court. The petitioners were the proponents of the ballot initiative known as Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage in California. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311767-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311767-3 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Following oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of [Hollingsworth v. Perry], lawyers and respondents spoke to reporters and answered questions about their case on the steps of the Court. The respondents were same-sex couples who were banned from getting married in California by Proposition 8. Other supporters also spoke. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311767-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311767-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT C-SPAN's coverage of the Supreme Court oral argument cases on same-sex marriage included scenes of advocates and opponents of marriage equality gathered on the public thoroughfares outside the Supreme Court, taped portions from earlier in the day of legal opinion on the cases, and reaction from viewers. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311660-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311660-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on the March 26 and 27 Supreme Court oral arguments in two same-sex marriage cases.*[Hollingsworth v. Perry] concerned California's Proposition 8 law, which amended the state constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to get married.*[United States v. Windsor] challenged the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311748-6 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311748-6 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Michael Klarman talked about the constitutional issues related to the two same-sex marriage cases being argued before the United States Supreme Court on March 26 and 26. [Hollingsworth v. Perry] concerned California's Proposition 8 law, which amended the state constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to get married.*[United States v. Windsor] challenged the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Professor Klarman explained some of the Court's possible rulings in the cases, and some of the arguments of the various concerned parties, and he responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. Nancy Calo read news headlines from C-SPAN Radio at the end of the program. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311748-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311748-4 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT David Savage previewed the March 26 and 27 Supreme Court oral arguments in two same-sex marriage cases, and he responded to telephone calls and electronic communications.[Hollingsworth v. Perry] concerned California's Proposition 8 law, which amended the state constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to get married.*[United States v. Windsor] challenged the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [Hollingsworth v. Perry] concerned California's Proposition 8 law, which amended the state constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to get married.*[United States v. Windsor] challenged the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Mr. Savage described explained the laws and how the cases made it to the Court, and speculated on how the justices might rule. Nancy Calo read news headlines from C-SPAN Radio at the end of the program. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311748-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311748-3 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on the March 26 and 27 Supreme Court oral arguments in two same-sex marriage cases.[Hollingsworth v. Perry] concerned California's Proposition 8 law, which amended the state constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to get married. [United States v. Windsor] challenged the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311748-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311748-2 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Legal scholars previewed the two same-sex marriage cases to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on March 26 and 27, 2013. [Hollingsworth v. Perry] concerned California's Proposition 8 law, which amended the state constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to get married. [United States v. Windsor] challenged the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Paul Smith argued that laws preventing equal recognition of same-sex couples should be held unconstitutional, while Edward Whelan argued that these issues should be left to the democratic process to decide. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311709-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311709-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Brian Brown talked about the National Organization for Marriage's arguments against the legalization of same-sex marriage. The Supreme Court was to hear two cases on the issue later in the month. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311419-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311419-4 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [Shelby County v. Holder]. The case concerns Congress' 2006 re-authorization of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act, and whether Congress exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act says that states and localities with a history of disenfranchising minorities, mainly in the South, must get federal approval before changing their voting procedures. Justice Scalia stated that congressional support for the Voting Rights Act is due to the "perpetuation of racial entitlement." He then went on to say, "Whenever a society adopts racial entitlements, it is very difficult to get out of them through the normal political processes." This program contained audio with still images of participants as they spoke. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311193-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311193-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Ari Berman and Hans Von Spakovsky talked about the Supreme Court case challenging a provision of the Voting Rights Act known as Section 5, which says states and localities with a history of disenfranchising minorities must get federal approval before changing their voting procedures. The guests also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311217-5 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311217-5 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Former Solicitor General Theodore Olson and Former Acting Solicitor General Walter Dellinger gave an overview of the cases before the Supreme Court during the 2012-13 term. Cases discussed included drug-dog sniffing cases, a voting rights case, an affirmative action case, and same-sex marriage cases. They also reflected on the previous term's cases over the Affordable Care Act. "U.S. Supreme Court Perspectives" was a luncheon program at the National Association of Attorneys General Winter/Spring Meeting at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Washington, D.C. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311185-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311185-2 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [Missouri v. McNeely] to weigh the public's interest in driving and highway safety against the privacy rights of the individual in deciding if police officers can force suspected drunk drivers to give a blood sample without first obtaining a warrant. This case was on appeal from the Missouri Supreme Court, which sided with the motorist McNeely in agreeing that the taking of his blood without a search warrant was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment's ban against unreasonable searches and seizures. Missouri prosecutors and the government were asking the Court to set aside the requirement for a search warrant arguing that since alcohol dissipates in the blood, a police officer should not take the time to get a warrant from a judge. Audio of the arguments was presented with visual still images of participants. Justice Thomas did not speak. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/310306-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/310306-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on the Supreme Court's agreeing to hear two cases related to same-sex marriage. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309855-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309855-2 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT David Savage previewed the coming months of the Supreme Court, and he responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. He discussed the justices' were to meet the following week to consider appeals surrounding same-sex marriage. Other topics included cases related to the Voting Rights Act and the legality of arrested suspects' DNA, the makeup of the court, and the possibility of any retirement. Bobbi Jackson read news headlines from C-SPAN Radio at the end of the program. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309508-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309508-3 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral argument in [Florida v. Harris]. The case addressed the circumstances under which an alert from a narcotics-sniffing dog was sufficient to establish probable cause for a subsequent search. [Florida v. Harris] was one of two Supreme Court cases during the 2012-13 term that focused on privacy rights and the reliability of drug-sniffing dogs and working animals in law enforcement efforts to obtain search warrants. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309366-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309366-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The Court heard oral argument in [Florida v. Jardines], which addressed the use of drug-sniffing dogs on the exterior of a home. The case was one of two cases during the 2012-13 term focused on privacy rights and the reliability of drug-sniffing dogs and working animals in law enforcement efforts to obtain search warrants. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309284-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/309284-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Criminal, privacy, and constitutional law scholars discussed the upcoming [Florida v. Jardines] and [Florida v. Harris] Supreme Court cases. Both cases focused on privacy rights and the reliability of drug-sniffing dogs and working animals in law enforcement efforts to obtain search warrants. Trainer Andy Falco gave a search demonstration with one of his dogs. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308986-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308986-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Coutney Bowie and Stuart Taylor discussed the [Fisher v. University of Texas] affirmative action case that was heard by the Supreme Court earlier that week, as well as the contemporary role of affirmative action. They also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308803-4 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308803-4 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The Court heard oral argument on [Fisher v. University of Texas]. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308726-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308726-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Telephone lines were open for comments on Supreme Court oral argument in [Fisher v. University of Texas], a case related to affirmative action and college admissions. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308677-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308677-2 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Adam Liptak previewed Supreme Court oral arguments in [Fisher v. University of Texas], a case related to affirmative action and college admissions. Mr. Liptak participated by phone. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308677-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308677-3 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The U.S. Supreme Court heard a second oral argument in [Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum], on the reach of a 1789 law, the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), that seeks to impose liability in U.S. courts on those who commit human rights violations in foreign countries. In the first oral argument The Court heard argument on the case in the 2011-12 term on the aspect of the case pertaining solely to the question of suing corporations under the ATS. Audio of the arguments was presented with visual still images of participants. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308614-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308614-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW Discussion and debate of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum a day after the U.S. Supreme Court s rehearing of the case. Panelists: Paul Hoffman , lead counsel for the plaintiffs who will be arguing the case the day before Katie Redford , co-founder and U.S. office director, EarthRights International John B. Bellinger , III, partner, Arnold & Porter; former legal advisor, U.S. Department of State Andrew Grossman , litigator, BakerHostetler; legal fellow, The Heritage Foundation Moderator: Steve Vladeck , professor and associate dean of scholarship, American University Washington College of Law http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308531-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308531-1 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT Jess Bravin talked about the opening of the Supreme Court 2012-13 term and the cases to be reviewed and heard during the term, and he responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. Other topics included the dynamic among the justices in light of the ruling that upheld the Affordable Care Act, how the Court might change due to retirement vacancies, and the history of the annual Red Mass that marks the start of the new Supreme Court term. C-SPAN Radio's Nancy Calo read news headlines at the end of the program. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308479-3 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308479-3 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT The Federalist Society previewed the 2012 U.S. Supreme Court Term. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308495-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/308495-2 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT