<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>America and the Courts - Communication Today Popluar Events - C-SPAN Video Library</title>
    <description>The most popular events for the America and the Courts - Communication Today Series</description>
    <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/browse?browse=series&amp;id=1</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2013, National Cable Satellite Corporation</copyright>
    <managingEditor>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:32:58 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <category>America and the Courts - Communication Today</category>
    <item>
      <title>Freedom of Information Cases</title>
      <description>The Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in appeals against the decisions in lower courts of [Fox News Network LLC v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System] and [Bloomberg LP v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System]. Both the Fox News Network and Bloomberg asked, using the Freedom of Information Act, that the U.S. Federal Reserve be forced to reveal the identities of financial institutions that may have collapsed without assistance from the government's emergency lending programs.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/291182-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/291182-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Race and the 2008 Campaign</title>
      <description>Professor Cornel West talked about American society, race, politics and class. He discussed Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton's primary race. He was interviewed by Frank Rich and responded to audience members' questions.
 
 This event of the New York Times Arts and Leisure Week (formerly Weekend) was held at The Times Center.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/203593-2</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/203593-2</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[CBS v. FCC] Oral Argument</title>
      <description>Oral arguments were heard at the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in [CBS v. FCC]. The case concerned the CBS television network's appeal of a $550,000 fine levied by the Federal Communications Commission for a performance by Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake during CBS' coverage of the 2004 Super Bowl that involved partial nudity. This was the second time the Third Circuit heard this case. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the case but sent it back to the Third Circuit to be reviewed in light of the Supreme Court ruling on "fleeting expletives" in [FCC v. Fox Television].</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/292229-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/292229-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Fox Television v. FCC]</title>
      <description>The Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City heard oral argument in Fox Television v. FCC. The Court will decide if the Federal Communications Commission's policy on the broadcast of curse words (also called "fleeting expletives") during live programs violates the First Amendment. This is the second time the Second Circuit Court heard this case.
Both the attorneys and judges use language during this oral argument that some may find offensive.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/291305-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/291305-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Fox Television v. FCC] Oral Argument</title>
      <description>Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of [Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission]. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.
 
 Language used may offend some viewers.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195903-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195903-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Role of the Media in Covering National Security Issues</title>
      <description>Panelists talked about the role of the media in covering national security issues. Among the topics they addressed were sourcing, presentation of classified or sensitive material, research methods, and responsible journalism. They also answered questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/291976-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/291976-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[U.S. Department of Defense v. the Associated Press]</title>
      <description>In New York City the Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on [U.S. Department of Defense v. the Associated Press]. The Court must decide if the Pentagon has to release the identities of Guantanamo Bay detainees. The case stems from a 2007 Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the Associated Press (AP). The government turned over transcripts from the tribunals but redacted facts about each detainee's identity. In March 2008 a U.S. district judge rejected the government's argument that the detainees' names should be kept secret to protect their privacy rights and ordered the government to give unredacted copies of the hearings to the Associated Press.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/205288-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/205288-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Cases on First Amendment Issues</title>
      <description>Legal scholars spoke about free speech and First Amendment cases heard by the Supreme Court in the 2006-2007 term. Among the topics they addressed were campaign finance reform laws, political advertising, federal faith-based programs, union dues and participation in union activities, and speech issues in the schools. Mr. Shapiro moderated the panel which responded to questions from the audience.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200780-3</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200780-3</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[CBS v. FCC]</title>
      <description>Oral arguments were heard at the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in [CBS v. FCC]. The case concerned the CBS television network's appeal of a $550,000 fine levied by the Federal Communications Commission for a performance by Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake during CBS' coverage of the 2004 Super Bowl that involved partial nudity. 
 
 Mr. Corn-Revere represented CBS. Mr. Miller represented the FCC.
 
 This program contained audio with still images of participants as they spoke.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200660-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/200660-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Press in Times of War</title>
      <description>ABA Annual Conference - American Press in Times of War</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/280516-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/280516-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Orkin v. Taylor] Oral Arguments</title>
      <description>The Ninth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in [Orkin et al. v. Taylor]. A lower court dismissed the Orkin family's claim to a painting in the possession of actress Elizabeth Taylor on the grounds that the California three-year statute of limitations had run out. Elizabeth Taylor bought the painting in 1963 at Sotheby's auction house in London, believing the artwork belonged to another German Jew, Alfred Wolf. Four descendants of the late Margarete Mauthner sued seeking to claim the Van Gogh painting, "View of the Asylum and Chapel at St. Remy," lost when she fled Nazi Germany in 1939. The plaintiffs claim that Taylor should return the painting under the Holocaust Victims Redress Act, the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act, and other "judicially formulated policies that encourage prospective buyers of artworks on the international market" to take precautions against acquiring Nazi-confiscated and other stolen materials.
 
 Mr. Hamilton is attorney for the Orkin family. Mr. Reiss is attorney for Elizabeth Taylor.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/196779-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/196779-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>America and the Courts</title>
      <description>On Monday, January 29, 2007, Senator Arlen Specter introduced legislation from the Senate floor on allowing cameras in the Supreme Court. 
 
 [Legal Times] Supreme Court Correspondent Tony Mauro discussed the legislation, the history of cameras in the courts, and where the Supreme Court Justices stand on the issue. 
 
 The program includes video clips of the Justices discussing "cameras in the court" including Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice Anthony Kennedy, Justice David Souter, Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Justice Samuel Alito.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/196511-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/196511-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cameras in the Courts</title>
      <description>First Senators Grassley and Schumer testified. Then judges, attorneys and television executives testified about the use of cameras in the courtrooms of various federal courts. Among the topics they addressed were the potential value of public access to federal judicial proceedings through television coverage, the reluctance of the U.S. Supreme Court to televise coverage of oral arguments, ways in which news media might use television footage and visual imagery, and First Amendment issues. They also talked about past requests by news organizations to open proceedings to cameras, potential types and numbers of viewers, and different venues where the public might witness various proceedings, as well as potential disadvantages to the presence of cameras.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/189838-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/189838-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reporters' Confidentiality Case</title>
      <description>Mr. Abrams, attorney for [New York Times] correspondent Judith Miller, and Mr. Keller spoke to reporters about the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) leak of Valerie Plame Wilson and the contempt hearing for Ms. Miller and [Time] magazine correspondent Matthew Cooper. Following their remarks, they responded to questions and comments from the reporters. Then, Mr. Cooper spoke to the reporters about the hearing. Other journalists were shown at a rally in support.
 
 Ms. Miller was unable to attend as she was taken into custody to be incarcerated at a jail in the metropolitan area.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/187511-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/187511-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Grand Jury News Stakeout</title>
      <description>Ms. Miller spoke to reporters after her testimony before a grand jury on an investigation into the leak of a CIA operative's name by White House officials. She had been jailed for 85 days for refusing to reveal the source of her information and spoke about her decision to testify after receiving a waiver directly from her source. She also talked about the conditions under which she gave the testimony. Following her remarks she answered questions from the reporters.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/189129-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/189129-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reflections on Careers in the Media</title>
      <description>As part of a C-SPAN and Comcast project to encourage dialog between students and national leaders, Mr. Madison spoke to high school students about public service, the relation between journalism and politics, and his experiences as a media personality. Following his remarks he answered questions from the students.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/176389-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/176389-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Judicial System and the Press in the Americas</title>
      <description>Panelists discussed the relationship between judges and the media. Some topics included journalists disobeying court orders by publishing interviews with past jurors on controversial cases, as well as the appropriateness of judges criticizing their superiors openly through the media. A question and answer session followed the discussion. Justice Breyer only participated in the question and answer session. 
 
 The Hemisphere Summit on Justice and Freedom of the Press in the Americas was a conference of journalists and supreme court justices from 20 nations.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/170796-2</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/170796-2</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Judicial System and the Press in the Americas</title>
      <description>At the Hemisphere Summit on Justice and Freedom of the Press in the Americas, Mr. Cox gave opening remarks. Then Justice Breyer talked about judicial independence and freedom of the press. He spoke at a three-day summit for journalists and supreme court justices from 20 nations. He took questions from the audience after his remarks.</description>
      <link>http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/170796-1</link>
      <author>info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation)</author>
      <category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/170796-1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
