The most popular programs for the Judicial Proceeding - Business & Commerce type. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/browse?browse=format&id=33 en-US Copyright 2013, National Cable Satellite Corporation info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT Sun, 26 May 2013 07:53:49 GMT Judicial Proceeding - Business & Commerce The Supreme Court heard oral argument in [Wal-Mart v. Dukes], a gender discrimination case against Wal-Mart over pay and promotions for as many as 1.5 million current and former women employees. The issue is whether a large group should be allowed to band together in a lawsuit. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/298761-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/298761-1 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT The Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in appeals against the decisions in lower courts of [Fox News Network LLC v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System] and [Bloomberg LP v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System]. Both the Fox News Network and Bloomberg asked, using the Freedom of Information Act, that the U.S. Federal Reserve be forced to reveal the identities of financial institutions that may have collapsed without assistance from the government's emergency lending programs. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/291182-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/291182-1 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral argument in [American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut]. The case focused on the ability of states and private parties to sue utilities for contributing to global warming, and how federal law would be applied. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/299147-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/299147-1 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [FCC vs. FOX Television]. The case examines the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) tougher enforcement protocol announced in 2004 in reaction to separate instances of foul language and nudity on both FOX and ABC television networks. The Court will decide if the FCC has the constitutional right to enforce rules prohibiting indecent language and nudity on broadcast television and radio. Both the attorneys and judges use language during this oral argument that some may find offensive. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303631-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303631-1 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of [Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission]. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively. Language used may offend some viewers. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195903-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195903-1 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting], involving an Arizona immigration law that imposes sanctions on businesses for hiring illegal immigrants and requires the verification of prospective employees' immigration status against a federal database. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296991-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296991-1 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in [Knox vs. Service Employees]. The case deals with the question of the First Amendment giving state employees the right to decline to pay union dues used for political advocacy by the union. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303630-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/303630-1 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT After a break, Microsoft and U.S. attorneys continued to present arguments to a seven-judge panel in Microsoft's appeal in the [U.S. v. Microsoft] antitrust case. Issues included monopoly maintenance and time. Still photographs of the participants were shown during the audio transmission. Mr. Urowsky represented Microsoft. Mr. Minear represented the United States. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/162795-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/162795-2 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT Microsoft and U.S. attorneys presented arguments to a seven-judge panel in Microsoft's appeal in the [U.S. v. Microsoft] antitrust case. Issues included monopoly maintenance and time. Still photographs of the participants were shown during the audio transmission. Mr. Urowsky represented Microsoft. Mr. Minear represented the United States. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/162795-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/162795-1 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT Oral arguments were heard in the federal appeals court case of [Bank of America v. City of Santa Monica]. The case questions whether a city ordinance can limit ATM fees charged by banks. The cities of Santa Monica and San Francisco lost in the lower court and are appealing the summary judgment for the Bank of America and two other banks that were granted relief against the cities' ordinances preventing the bank from levying ATM surcharges. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/168264-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/168264-1 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT Microsoft and U.S. attorneys presented arguments and answered questions from a seven-judge panel on attempted monopolization, conduct of the previous antitrust trial, relief decisions, and judicial statements to the media during the trial. Still images of the judges and attorneys were shown as the audio presentations were made. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/162817-1 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/162817-1 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT Microsoft and U.S. attorneys presented arguments and answered questions from a seven-judge panel on attempted monopolization, conduct of the previous antitrust trial, relief decisions, and judicial statements to the media during the trial. Still images of the judges and attorneys were shown as the audio presentations were made. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/162817-2 info@c-spanarchives.org (National Cable Satellite Corporation) http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/162817-2 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT